Every time I go to the piefed frontpage I’m blown away by how much more polished it is. It has all the bells and whistles that lemmy is sometimes missing.

Whats the catch? Why aren’t we recommending everyone goes to piefed instead of lemmy?

App support is one thing I can think of.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Yeah, that makes sense for the defect class of performance problems. I’m more concerned with the inherent performance (compute) disadvantages of Python. Perhaps they wouldn’t matter, hard to know without load testing.

    I didn’t downvote.

    • Snoopy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, i thought the same about rust and python. i’m not a dev and lack understanding on their component.

      My opinion became more nuanced with Lemmy. I have read there spike in ressource usage with lemmy on server.

      So, I believe the language matter but also its features, the way you think how people will use it. Its core design.

      When you manage a social network, the most fondamental feature is the moderation board. I find this area is lacking on Lemmy. Crosspost ? Duplicate everywhere, on my timeline, i get 4-5 time the same post…so i believe it miss some design thinking.

      From what i see, the various lemmy-bot (most of them are written in python i think ?) and alternative frontend are improving lemmy experience. For example, how do you add an mod with lemmy-web-ui ?

      I also believe that being written in Rust make it harder for new devs to help. But in later time we will see a change.

      I’m not sure if it answer part of your question, but there are area where lemmy can improve : https://join.piefed.social/2024/02/09/comparing-network-utilization-of-lemmy-kbin-and-piefed/