• Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    No, not true. Go read Wikipedia for some reliable sources on the historical existence of Jesus of Nazareth.

    • CXORA@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Do you notice the comment you replied to explicitly said “first hand” and you explicitly said “reliable”.

      You are talking about different things.

      • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        I said go there for some reliable sources.

        You want evidence of the historical Jesus, that article contains almost 300 references and about 40 external sources.

        The existence of Jesus of Nazareth is widely accepted. If you believe otherwise, you need to provide extraordinary evidence for your extraordinary claims.

    • Meltdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Lmao, dude honestly just suggested Wikipedia as a reliable source of information. Fucking hell