My apartment building turns 100 this year.
My apartment building turns 100 this year.
There are three factors that might prevent you from using an online platform to share your opinion:
The government might impose content restrictions on the platform
The owners (or delegated moderators) of the platform might impose restrictions on its users
The users of the platform might use its tools to police the opinions of other users.
“Freedom of speech” normally just applies to the first. Is that what you mean when you say you’re not “allowed” to speak freely?
Dont say Prometheus
Ok… it was Προμηθεύς.
If you think they’d be open to it, try Bayes’ theorem. Ask them to give percent likelihoods for the following:
A. The odds that the government (or whoever) is trying to kill everyone, before taking the evidence of excess deaths into account
B. The odds of seeing excess deaths for any possible reason, not just their conspiracy hypothesis
C. The odds of seeing excess deaths if the conspiracy hypothesis were true.
Then logically, the odds of the conspiracy being real given the excess deaths should be A*C/B. If you disagree with them on the outcome, you must disagree on one or more of the assumptions (probably A—if it’s B, you can find the objective odds by checking historical data).
If you still disagree on the prior assumption (A), you can set aside the excess deaths argument and ask what other evidence led them to form that prior assumption. Then you can repeat the process until you either reach agreement or they’re left with an assumption they have no evidence for.
If life is an experiment, and there is a measuring tool
So that’s what keeps causing our wave function to collapse!
How does that compare to the growth in size of the overall code base?
They’ve got to do something with the cows once they’re too old to milk.
I think it’s more likely that you need to be able to empathize with someone in order to recognize when they’re being empathetic, and you empathize most with the middle class.
I grew up in California near the bay area calling them weed whackers.
Same.
It was the standard English printed style in the US and UK from the 1860s until the early 20th century, gradually phasing out by the 1950s.
For printers with variable spaces, it was typical to use a hair space before the punctuation and an em space after.
For more details, see this article on the history of sentence spacing.
If there’s a new party willing to take over administration of the entire instance as-is, why not just transfer ownership of the original server?
I assume it’s because it reduces the possibility of other processes outside of the linked containers accessing the files (so security and stability).
I get the smallest phone available and don’t use a case because I don’t like the bulk.
I also figure a smaller piece of glass is less likely to break when dropped, so the size is a sort of protection in itself.
Not absolute pressure, but pressure per unit of work (i.e., efficiency).
Even if they were physically separated you’d want them to pump in sync, to maximize the pressure. So having them share electrical signals is just the optimal setup for two hearts.
It’s better, which is why we already do.
Mammals have a double circulatory system, with the left and right ventricles effectively acting as separate hearts that happen to be physically connected.
Imagine if every time you read a news report, or work of fiction, or gardening manual, or anything where the time of day is relevant, you’d need to know what longitude the text originated at and then mentally convert it to your familiar local time before you know whether the events described are in the morning, afternoon, or night.
And preceded by “it’s worse than that”.
The environmental sensors on my local network.
Fish.