BlitzFitz

I’d say since angels are imaginary, √-1 angels would fit on a pin head.

I mean this is a good idea, but the opposite of the question stated. Are there no think tanks to implement liberal solutions as opposed to stopping or fixing conservatives policies.

Why can’t we scheme as well as conservatives?

There is also a step of washing your decarbed cannabis before soaking in butter or alcohol to absorb the THC.

Worked well when we used abv. Really removed the burnt and leafy taste out.

Pretty much just soak your decarb until it doesn’t smell, with multiple washes. THC doesn’t absorb into water. So won’t weaken your batch.

Ok, but that’s for the EC and for presidential and VP nominees by the EC.

In the dnc we have delegates with 1 vote for their nominee. If the delegates vote for 1 dem and another gets the 2nd amount of votes, then they’d be Pres and VP nominees for the dnc. Or actually do ranked choice for dnc nominees to get voter ranking of nominees.

How is it better for a presidential nominee to pick who they want vs listening to the peoples actual preferences.

How would nominating a dem VP by Dems via voting cause a civil war?

And if it’s just for one party vs both, what would that be bad?

I get why it was changed for VP for the dem vs Republican nominee. But why wouldn’t we want, as a party, better representation on who we voted for.

Maybe it’s the time to go back to how things were when the US was founded. We have a vote and top two are President and VP nominees. Keeps the party aligned to what we actually care about and who we think is best, vs who the nominee or party thinks might be best.

More democratic this way

I think this is pointing out the US agencies Aren’t dumb enough to use an open source ai to try to generate code for hacking activities.

The did that too, and conservative figures books.

Article lays it all out pretty well

Is no one else looking at this line the school district is at this point just pulling every possible book that could match the description of the law in purpose to make a point?

One teacher made a complaint about a couple of books so they said fine, well just remove everything else that this bill could possibly touch. Just to prove how ambiguous and far stretching this law can go?

Of course they shouldn’t pull a dictionary but it matches the description. This is to test the law.

I believe there is an initiative by some big banks to push for wire transfers to be done via a blockchain as opposed to slow ach transfers.

They call it quantum computing or something like that… but seemed like it had potential to solve some issues with slow banking

First world problems…

Lol sort of. That’s more like two people talking at the same time at each other. But more kicking

I have actually dealt with a partial deaf blind student back in elementary school.

You can sign ASL into their hand so they can feel what you’re signing(normally individual letters). Or they hold your hands to feel the gesture/sign you’re are making.

They read braille as a just a blind person would.

But over all takes more effort to learn this way.