• 3 Posts
  • 162 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle

  • wouldn’t this policy instantly seem inappropriate?

    Out of context, yes. However, lemmy.world has been banning people for jokes or PERCEIVED call for violence.

    It feels more like a “I’m having a bad day and i’m taking it out on you.” On top of that, the incresing amount of fake news sites or uncreditable news outlets is alarming. If the goal was to be reddit 2.0 , Mission accomplish.

    At what point is a statement which incites violence “violating site rules” and at what point is it “legitimate discussion of impending hostilities”.

    I feel this should be the point if his threat is carried out. Everything up to this point could be argued in a manner that it is still, no matter how crazy it sounds, in hia scope of power. Removing an elected political adversary due to their political party would mean starting over with a constitution.













  • Work requirements. Other states have done this before. They all canned it because they found out, work requirements don’t increase work. It decrease the use of those that qualify. It increases paperwork which can be rejected by errors.

    You also have the SSDI part. Most people that are disabled don’t qualify for SSDI.

    I personally know someone that had double kidney failure. This is from a direct issue the U.S. government caused acknowledged. However, they don’t what to make it easy and hope the people just die. Which is a very strong possibility. They DO NOT qualify for SSDI.

    Next time they get sick, they will die. Point Blank.