https://github.com/Open-Shell/Open-Shell-Menu
IIRC it was too “classic” for me.
I played around with another open-source shell for a bit, Cairo Shell / Cairo Desktop Environment, but it wasn’t able to replace my default shell.
Go to the homepage and click Samwise :D
What made it “a decade ahead”?
I’ve never seen one in action.
Imagine they eventually drop their own ai and remain a smartphone company.


Protected area but these kinds of activities. I’m confused. Allowing that is the opposite of protection.
I wonder how the subsidies compare to those for more healthy fishing. Current seems like a tragedy.
Good to read about phase out, but even now four more years seems quite long. I guess it’s a matter of which side you look at it from.


Maybe we all have to train being able to liste and talk at the same time, like interpreters/translators.


people are also losing basic conversational skills, […], like how to not interrupt people.
That sounds funny. Not being able to not interrupt people? Seems unfathomable to me.


Now that I can do self-checkout when buying groceries: -hello -with card please -thanks -bye = -6 words


Call center? :P
Everyone is working in call centers and public service /s
What do you mean by private? If they’re non-self-hosted, then they’re not private by definition.


It’s not super obvious, but I do see a ‘next page’ link at the bottom, before footnote references.
Next: Dynamics.


A technical post in the Technology community, nice!


Are they using ai to fix them?
Please add cross-references when you post the same post to two communities at the same time. That way, people can find the other comments and discussion.


admitted to sabotaging their company’s AI by entering proprietary info into public AI chatbots, using unapproved AI tools, or intentionally using low-quality AI output in their work without fixing it.
Are the first two really sabotaging AI initiatives? The output is still the same.
The first sounds like a security and data use issue to me. The second sounds like users may look for better tools because the provided tools are lacking - which is not sabotage. The third is the only one clearly indicating sabotage to me. (Reasonable malicious compliance under presumably bad requirements and pressure.)


They already have a foot in the door.


That was someone else. Different people in this comment chain.
From the README (emphasis mine):
⚠️ We are excited about the amount of interest Thunderbolt has been getting and want to clarify that it is still early and under active development. Currently, we are targeting enterprise customers that want to deploy it on-prem. We encourage you to self-host it and try it out, but there are a few caveats we are still working on:
Mozilla is so untrustworthy these days that they had to cite themselves in the testimonial
okay, that’s kinda funny and ironic.
And it’s their only testimonial on the website. From the screenshot I thought it’d be one of multiple.
Given it’s a new product, not too surprising though, I guess. I wonder if they had any testing/cooperation partners.
They say it’s a QR code challenge, resistant to bots, but what does it to? How does it work?