Which seems fine in spirit, but we don’t really want the letter of the law making something like this
O/-<
illegal
Which seems fine in spirit, but we don’t really want the letter of the law making something like this
O/-<
illegal
Utopia (UK 2 season version)
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_jIDr2tZiuRHlp-bLwYNgWaFAp6dR7_Y
Fiddy.
Not too expensive.
Is there an AR app for warhammer 40k yet, to measure distances, get stats, roll dice etc?
1m Bullet chess.
I finally understand why gamers obsess about ping.
Before Google dominated you had a different search engine for blogs, mp3s, warez, link pages etc. You also had directories where the content of the web was neatly organised by topic.
Make sure you use the right type of search engine for the type of information you want.
Space X has less bureaucracy and can pursue other commercial ventures. The amount nasa pays is high, but it’s still cheaper than continuing their old program
So … shouldn’t German screws now turn to the left?
Get off my lawn
I don’t think someone painting a physically copy of the image will gain ownership of the copyright.
I’m going to assume the other person has that covered.
I’m filling mine with 4k baby shark music videos.
I think we need to know the average number of lendings for hardback vs ebook over a 2 year period. In theory, the library should be indifferent to the format being lent out and the costs should reflect that.
Borrow the hardback
The digital titles often come with a price tag that’s far higher than what consumers pay. While one hardcover copy of Cook’s latest novel costs the library $18, it costs $55 to lease a digital copy – a price that can’t be haggled with publishers.
And for that, the e-book expires after a limited time, usually after one or two years, or after 26 check outs, whichever comes first. While e-books purchased by consumers can last into perpetuity, libraries need to renew their leased e-material.
Totally agree with paying for recently written books. But are you cool with paying authors who have been dead for 69 years?
4 + 2i
Get good enough and just dodge the bullets
What is the incentive for the democratic party to ever chase votes rather than money?