It’s a little uneven because they seem to basically rotate the new people in for suicide missions in small groups. So there’s still a pool of people farther in the rear not getting hit at such high rates.

I assume you would only do that on like a sample document for a client or a draft, specifically so it won’t be used in an actual court.

In theory if you didn’t have heating you could get a cheap used machine and run it and the revenue might cover the cost of heating and you get a free to run space heater.

For basic stuff like rice the US produces way more than it needs, the only real imports I see are for specialty stuff like jasmine rice or bhasmati rice from Thailand or India. Basic long grain rice or calrose is domestic and very cheap.

The dollar is internal and farmers make annual purchases so they will have already bought their stuff they need for this season so they shouldn’t be too affected by exchange rates. The US makes its own oil and derivatives like fertilizer and farm equipment so they shouldn’t be too affected for now.

For this current season specifically there will be a glut of food and not enough buyers. In the future if these farmers go out of business then prices could increase.

There is more supply than needed, we normally make so much we export huge quantities. How does restricted food exports increase prices domestically?

The comments about capitalism and price gouging and stuff are all fine and correct. But that would logically apply whether the exports were restricted or not. But they have to do something with all the food they were going to export or not. Sometimes they’ll just burn it or dump milk but they can probably sell, just at a lower price or pay more to ship it farther away. Now long term yes if these farmers go out of business then prices could increase if the supply shrinks but that doesn’t really apply to this year.

The problem with the reasoning I see here is that you lot are taking things you heard and applying them to this situation, but you just say capitalism and that’s the end of your argument. Supply and demand still affect prices, especially on a large scale and with commodity goods.

Quality maybe but there’s no reason domestically produced food should go up a lot. The fact that China refused tons of pork and soy beans imports from America means there will be a glut and that means terrible finances for farmers but hardly expensive food.

Most food in the US is domestically produced, so no. The US is a huge exporter of food outside of specialty goods and tropical things.

Domestically produced food shouldn’t go up that much.

And yet I know more than you and am correct. Maybe because you are just guessing and don’t have actual first hand knowledge.

It is quite common to have CDL drivers that only speak Spanish whether or not they’re supposed to be able to speak English.

Just like reddit to downvote someone who actually knows what the fuck they’re talking about because it doesn’t sound right to you.

You don’t have to take a class. That’s optional for people that don’t know how to drive a truck. Anyone can read signs. They don’t change. I’ve dealt with hundreds of CDL drivers and I’ve seen dozens that only speak Spanish.

You don’t need to speak English to know turn left and stop.

That is not correct. There are many CDL drivers who only speak Spanish. If you’re talking about the test, that’s a joke.

Do you have numbers for that? Because staffing is already very short and the ratio of workers to people needing care will get much higher. And a lot of them will want to stay in their home, which needs a much higher amount of care than in a centralized facility.

If you can get even low quality robots that can provide some amount of elder care, even if it’s just reminding them to take prescriptions and helping them walk, then you can drastically reduce the economic problems. there will be massive shortages of basic CNA and nursing home care workers.

A lower population isn’t that bad. It’s just that the transition when you have a very large old population and a small young one is very difficult.

We’ve already had reports of him propositioning employees for sex for money. You don’t think he considers everyone on Twitter his property?

Yeah, but it would probably make more sense to just have like a universal 10 percent default rate for “other” as a category.