MotoAsh

Your glee with engaging with your own ignorance is just pathetic.

rofl way to say you don’t understand how the world works without just saying it.

It has never existed and cannot exist next to capitalism. You are making MANY mistakes with your asinine post.

China isn’t not communist because they engage with capitalism… There not communist because their entire system isn’t communist…

When there’s one party, one ruler, and one set of people that get to rule over the rest … that’s specifically NOT communism.

Even if they didn’t engage with the world market, made every business a coop, they would still not be communist. At all.

That’s why any place with a fucking brain at minimum massively controls the assholes and at maximum puts them to death.

A place that enjoys freedom can exist, but what cannot happen is allowing the greedy assholes to strip away protections.

Though when money IS everyones’ “god”, the rich and greedy are more divine than us plebs…

In before the tankies try to claim China is totally seriously communist, no really.

It seems you’re making the oppposite mistake retard conservatives make, by pretending that actual communism would be so bad if it even could exist in a world dominated by capitalist global trade.

Those are far too generic of things to place you on the spectrum more than, “not a conservative fuckwad that doesn’t care about others”, which itself is a huge spectrum.

As Cowbee said, a lot of the differentiation on the left is economic prescription, and your plan for how to bring that prescription in to reality. Most all of the left is socially progressive and accepts others, so that’s not differentiating much.

Not just investors. Capitalists in general. The stock market just makes it much easier for capitalists to pretend that profit at any expense is wise.

The new Naked Gun, actually. The idea falls in to the same FUCK NO camp as every other god damn nostalgia grab from Hollywood in recent years. The plot is stupid, even compared to some of the old Leslie Nielsen movies that worked the plot developments in to jokes a bit better and naturally had more of their own humor than references … buuuuut, the execution still had me straight up laughing out loud at quite a lot of it.

That’s why it’s even more important to realize the machine has no intent. Its actions are solely the result of its creator’s actions in creating it.

I point out anthropomorphization so much because not only will it innoculate people against the advertising for it that WILL anthroporphize it, but when it fucks up, the appropriate people will be punished.

This isn’t a thinking machine going postal. It’s a dangerous product being pushed out with little regard for consequences.

Selling dangerous products used to mean something before billionaires bought the government…

It DOES matter. Directly. Fully.

If people think that the unthinking “AI” actually has autonomy, they will be less likely to hold the people responsible to account.

Why do you not understand that? It is a critical fact of the matter that modern day “AI” does not think nor want, because then responsibility of its actions should then rightfully fall on to who set up the Rube Goldberg machine with machetes on it.

This is not a machine going postal. It’s a dangerous product they’ve been allowed to sell.

We’re trying to impress on you the importance of culpability. If it thinks for itself, then it becomes a defective product. If it doesn’t, it’s a dangerous product.

It’s the difference between someone selling a car that happens to break down easily, and one where the brake lines randomly fall off because they fucked up the design and didn’t want to spend the money to do it right… It’s the difference between accidents and neglegence. This “AI” shit? Pure greed-fed neglegence.

The wording in the article is on purpose. They want you to think it doesn’t matter while they’re anthropomorphizing it, FFS. They want you to blame the bot, not the guy who made the obviously dangerous bot and then sold it to the world for billions.

Nowhere at all anywhere did I ever say AI is totally not a problem.

Maybe you should be less worried about reading between the lines and more worried about assuming what people didn’t say?

The bot didn’t want anything. It didn’t try to murder anyone. At all. What happened was, rich fucks with unchecked power are allowed to release dangerous, unethical products based on nothing but hype and vapid promises.

The only thing technology related is the involvment of AI, and it’s all BS and stupid. The AI DOES NOT WANT. The AI is not the one in control.

Without intent from the machine, this is EXACTLY THE SAME situation as every other time greedy capitalists pushed unsafe products.

Is the 9000000th time capitalists directly harmed society and those in it the time when humanity FINALLY learns to not let horrible shitheads run free over the world based on lies of promises!? Stay tuned to find out!!

Murder requires intent. This is just more anthropomorphization of LLMs…