It’s probably either in a yet-to-be-discovered bankers box at Mar-A-Lago, or sitting in an evidence locker after having been found in one.
It’s probably either in a yet-to-be-discovered bankers box at Mar-A-Lago, or sitting in an evidence locker after having been found in one.
I haven’t been out of my basement in a while, you might be upstairs right now.
My wife would say, “Did you look?”
In that it is evidence of the Republican party dissolving, yes.
Only ads for onions will be allowed before 9pm.
I’m on MBin. Your username is displayed as: walden. I can mouse over that to learn that your full username is @walden@sub.wetshaving.social.
This is the same thing as email domain names and display names. Yes, scammers still exploit that, too, but for the most part, people have gotten used to also looking at the actual full email address, and not just the display name or mailbox name. The same can happen here.
Still, I would much prefer if the default view here showed the full username and not just the display name.
OK is best K.
It’s less about outlawing fun and more about ensuring that exposure to the outside world is restricted.
Bad actors can afford $50 the same as good ones.
The difference between $0 and $50 isn’t really relevant.
LetsEncrypt is legit. A downside is that the certs expire after 90 days. However, that also carries an upside in that it limits the damage in case a certificate is compromised. There are procedures by which you can automatically renew/request (I forget whether they allow renewing an existing cert or require a brand new one) LE certs and apply them to your application, but that can be fiddly to configure.
If you’re not comfortable with configuring automatic certificate cycling, a long-term paid cert would be more appropriate.
It’s essentially virtue signalling, whether it’s online or offline. Since nobody is “for” serial rapists, for example (the current Republican candidate for president notwithstanding), the differentiation is being against “by what degree.” Calling for maiming, execution, torture, etc. positions the speaker as “better than” someone who doesn’t, to some people.
You know enough doctors well enough to know that most of them don’t want to go to a doctor?
This is kind of like asking “why isn’t there a white history month?”
Other benefits:
Downside:
Gah, my coffee to blood ratio is still too low.
Illegal voting by noncitizens is far less more rare than illegal voting by conservatives.
Edit: Oops, I got my modifier wrong because I switched up the order halfway through the comment.
One of the things which has helped me is consistently reminding myself that everyone is focused way more on themselves than on me, that nobody realy gives a fuck about me (with a small handful of exceptions), and that my thinking that everyone is thinking about me at all is a pretty self-centered outlook itself.
So he’s admitting that he would misappropriate funds?