There’s a butterfly meme to make here, not sure if it should be aimed at the scammer or the reposts

Doesn’t really matter. The important bit is he has no idea either. (It’s likely the former and he’s blaming the weirdos trying to get in)

This is a much better answer than the current top post.

It’s sized proportionally to the hand size of the commander in chief at the time.

Because the US conveniently aren’t part of the treaty.

The U.S. signed the Rome Statute in 2000 under President Bill Clinton but did not ratify it.

In 2002, President George W. Bush’s administration formally “unsigned” the treaty and passed the American Servicemembers’ Protection Act (ASPA), which restricts U.S. cooperation with the ICC and even authorizes measures to prevent the prosecution of U.S. personnel.

Hey cut our friend some slack, it’s probably PTSD from covid. Gather round, grandpas gonna tell a story…

There was a time you see, when it was not allowed to return your cart at the store as they had to be cleaned, you had to return it at the corral with the other biohazards.

They say that out there in the masses, some are still mentally in lockdown.

My comment does not say jury nullification shouldn’t exist/be allowed. It says the opposite.

Unpopular take but despite it being a popular thing, we want jury nullification to come from individual conclusions that this law does not apply despite the circumstances, and not because they know they can. Every study ever has shown that people who know about jury nullification tend to dismiss evidence more often, and are more easily deceived by a sympathetic/ non-sympathetic looking defendant. It’s not even a law, it’s the result of the fact juries can’t be prosecuted for their decisions so really they can do whatever they want. This is enough to know that technically you can “nullify the law”. That goes both ways, people can convict without evidence

Saying the law doesn’t actually apply despite the person having done the thing the law says not to do is very different from saying the punishment should be nil. This could also keep you from ever serving on a jury and telling others about this in certain circumstances could be a crime. All the legal minds who looked into this agree it should still remain a thing, but it shouldn’t be told to jurors explicitly. When you serve you swear to uphold the law, so it’s tricky to nullify without purgery perjury except for very very special cases.

This is not a good YSK, you should understand what the law is as a juror. You could in theory reword this entire post without actually using the term and that would probably be helpful, but super complicated to write.

Esit: I’m team Luigi (in mario kart of course)

A mix of cognitive bias and systemic racism

But also stereotypes exists and can be true to some degree, often just cultural

I think leaving gulf of mexico is ok

Try to find some that are made properly.

deleted by creator

22% of all americans. Out of the 63% that voted, half and some voted for him. You can consider all the fucktards who voted 3rd party, or didnt vote at all as being just as stupid.

And then there’s all the democrats who wanted to “teach a lesson” to dems by destroying democracy just to perpetuate the same genocide (and worse). “We did it Patrick, we save Palestine!” Jokes on them, dems didnt learn shit. Thats much more than 22% of americans, but in all fairness you said “at least 22%”

It’s funny because Americans had no issue putting all the british in the same brexit bowl but now there’s supposed to be nuance.

That’s not what taboo means.

It’s not taboo, it’s unpleasant to smell. (Ignoring that it’s gross).

Insecurity. “Males” is a pretty wide brush in this case

Why am i not surprised to immediately find garbage like “genocide Joe” in your post history.

You couldn’t even formulate an argument. Thanks for making it obvious why to block

He wasn’t just a joke, musk was legally forced to make his deal real to avoid having manipulated the market and potentially go to prison. This was before he became POTUS . If it happened today he would just tell the courts to fuck off and replace those who aren’t loyal without ever actually buying twitter

Twitter was never profitable until data was worth enough and even then…

Musk tried to pump and dump the stock by saying it was worth much more than it was. Then he immediately got sued because if you manipulate the market like that and have the cash to pay, you have to or it’s considered a crime. Musk then tried to back out, shareholders threaten to sue, and he pretended he actually didnt wanna back out and bought it.

He purchased it at twice its market value and has since not only cut 80% of staff, but also lost 80% of its original value (not the double musk paid)…

Twitter only had value to musk because he wanted to use it as a disinformation tool to help SA/Russia/China. He immediately made it a right wing platform where this content is more valuable. It was a dumb decision, still has a dumb business plan and a fuckton of debts. The only reason it didn’t disappear completely is Musk is too rich, but it’s trending down. It’s projected to grow as the US becomes an oligarchy but not because it has real value. Musk wants to turn it into Facebook+ Cash app

Buying twitter was all in all a terrible business move and mostly to stroke elons ego. Sadly this is “too big to fail” territory

Using their logic against them never works.

Because the war machine demands blood. Genocide is an American thing, not a presidential one