It’s surprising it doesn’t happen more often.

They send out review copies to “journalists” months in advance, all it takes is one of them to have poor opsec.

My non lawyer, and probably wrong, advice is to send them a polite reply asking them to refer to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram (1971)

There goes my plan to sell jailbroken iPhones to zoomers.

He’s “only” a centimillionaire, a single clinical trial can cost >$20m.

That’s a shame, rapamycin had a lot of promising studies.

To be fair he stopped that too, turns out you can’t do enough transfusions to make any difference.

They tried to fundraise for a head of trust and safety last month, but failed.

People aren’t going to donate for unimportant things.

I’m not defending idiots saying it cures cancer, but people dismissively calling ivermectin a “horse dewormer” when it’s approved for human use for all sorts of parasitic diseases is something that grinds my gears. It actually is something of a wonder drug, just not for what these idiots keep claiming.

Methylene blue is an approved drug too, (the first synthetic drug, coincidentally) it’s used for cyanide poisoning amongst other things. It’s also a MAOI, which makes it dangerous to take with a bunch of common medicines.

He’s rich, he can afford to buy them.

That’s just Ikea’s new rapid disassembly tool, ësplöddën

/r9k/

People also used to repair clothes a lot, darning, elbow patches, etc.

It sure is nice of the US government to compile a list of sources for us https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2024 Review of Notorious Markets of Counterfeiting and Piracy (final).pdf

There’s a study on it here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10691350/

And here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266651822100022X

An article about a specific retraction of a study on mentorship: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/checkpoints/202101/the-bad-retraction

The lancet removed (although not formally retracted) an article on covid-19 in Gaza https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/06/02/political-censorship-in-academic-journals-sets-a-dangerous-new-precedent/

China has allegedly forced at least one person to retract a study about public opinion on it https://retractionwatch.com/2024/07/10/author-blames-retraction-on-chinese-censorship/

Looking at some of the bug reports it looks like your dependency may already be using the MMU.

And?

It’s supposed to preserve them, retraction is sometimes used as a form of censorship. It’s a feature not a bug.

Is there a reason you didn’t use the ESP-S3’s MMU? https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/latest/esp32s3/api-reference/system/mm.html

Transformers, robotech, thunder cats, M.A.S.K, starcom.

I prefer sources with obvious bias since it makes it easier to account for. Sources that pretend to be unbias are far more insidious.

Turned? Have you ever heard of the Rockefeller and Morgan families?