

So, immigration for anti-immigration advocates?


So, immigration for anti-immigration advocates?


She is quite openly supporting Trump, a 30s glance at her wikipedia page would have told you so.


Yeah no. France is going head first into fascism, Macron is doing a very good job continuing the work of Napoleon and De Gaulle at destroying whatever “protocols” still protect democracy, while at the same time making the nazis look like moderate right, and the moderate left look like horrible far-left extremists antisemitic communists.
What is happening is a repeated act of Macron to show that he can do whatever he wants as “the boss” (and just that is enough into fascism to be considered closer to a form of dictatorship than a democracy), and people are getting used to it.
France has been considered by the International Federation for Human Rights, Human Rights League and World Organisation Against Torture to be dropping out of democracy since 2017.
This is not a hiccup, this is a collapse. France is on its way to be a fully fledged fascist country, and it probably is too late to stop it nonviolently.


If by “days” you mean 10 years, sure.


Isn’t he the piece of shit that was enjoying that someone that interrupted his show because of the shit he was saying, got heavily beaten up by security?


The difference being that they don’t know it’s a poison.


Conservatives are defined by the need to burn it all down. The point is that they see a horrible past as glorious, torture as duty, and war as peace.
It doesn’t matter who dies or whatnot, everything is just a tool towards this goal, not the actual motivation behind it.


You don’t really throw a racial slur “just one time”; but when you try to not use it in public, one slip up happens.


Your whole logic is based on the idea that being able to do something means understanding that thing. This is simply wrong.
Humans feel emotions, yet they don’t understand them. A calculator makes calculations, but no one would say that it understands math. People blink and breathe and hear, without any understanding of it.
The concept of understanding implies some form of meta-knowledge about the subject. Understanding math is more than using math, it’s about understanding what you’re doing and doing it out of intention. All of those things are absent in an AI, neural net or not. They cannot “see the world” because they need to be programmed specifically for a task to be able to do it; they are unable to actually grow out of their programming, which is what understanding would ultimately cause. They simply absorb data and spit it back out after doing some processing, and the fact that an AI can be made to produce completely incompatible results shows that there is nothing behind it.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_sequence
With your logic, these numbers understand grammar too because they can form sentences.
Even better, anything that any human could ever say is contained in those, and as such, humanity has a more limited grammar understanding than a sequence.
You cannot define understanding by the results, and even if you did, AIs give horrible results that prove that they do nothing else than automatically put words next to each other based on the likelihood of it making sense to humans.
They do not understand grammar just like they do not understand anything, they simply are an algorithm made to spit out “realistic” answers without having to actually understand them.
Another example of that is AIs that generate images: they’re full of nonsense because the AI doesn’t understand what it’s making, and that’s why you end up with weird artifacts that seem completely absurd to any human with basic understanding of reality.


Yeah no


Here come all the psychos who are going to justify it and say that it’s completely normal to throw pets as food.


Wow, I didn’t think there would be so many crazy psychos in the comments.
I can get that people might not feel as much empathy with animals than humans (get, not approve) but most of the comments are kitten-drowning level.
You get a pet, which is supposed to be a companion and basically part of your family, and you don’t mind them being torn to shreds?
Okay then, I guess if your kid has a terminal cancer we can also feed him to the tiger? After all in the end it’s just a bunch of meat.


Fascism is growing. New communication media are allowing for large scale, in-depth brainwashing.
People now strive more than ever to be part of the “norm” and eliminate all the rest. Capitalism keeps everyone so busy and self-centered that morals disappear. “Charismatic leaders” spearhead the new trends in a sect/religion approach.
It’s not stupidity of the masses. It’s an engineered death spiral, where the stupid people are the ones engineering it thinking that if it’s good for them, it is good.


Yeah, and people should have the right to say that you’re a worthless piece of shit as a consequence to that.


No it’s not. At most, you can use it combined (“male worker”) but no one normal says “a male” except when talking about animals. People who use it like that for humans are generally a big red flag.
And you don’t learn to use “mal” and “female” when you learn english, you only find that in toxic masculinity environments.


The good old red flag of talking about “males and females” instead of men and women like a normal person with a brain.


It’s a bit absurd to consider money and fame as success, unless you’re a crazy capitalist.


How is using a spoon different as to using a military tank? They’re both tools after all.
Isn’t that basically the essence of the US since like, forever?