The difference being that they don’t know it’s a poison.

Conservatives are defined by the need to burn it all down. The point is that they see a horrible past as glorious, torture as duty, and war as peace.

It doesn’t matter who dies or whatnot, everything is just a tool towards this goal, not the actual motivation behind it.

You don’t really throw a racial slur “just one time”; but when you try to not use it in public, one slip up happens.

Your whole logic is based on the idea that being able to do something means understanding that thing. This is simply wrong.

Humans feel emotions, yet they don’t understand them. A calculator makes calculations, but no one would say that it understands math. People blink and breathe and hear, without any understanding of it.

The concept of understanding implies some form of meta-knowledge about the subject. Understanding math is more than using math, it’s about understanding what you’re doing and doing it out of intention. All of those things are absent in an AI, neural net or not. They cannot “see the world” because they need to be programmed specifically for a task to be able to do it; they are unable to actually grow out of their programming, which is what understanding would ultimately cause. They simply absorb data and spit it back out after doing some processing, and the fact that an AI can be made to produce completely incompatible results shows that there is nothing behind it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_sequence

With your logic, these numbers understand grammar too because they can form sentences.

Even better, anything that any human could ever say is contained in those, and as such, humanity has a more limited grammar understanding than a sequence.

You cannot define understanding by the results, and even if you did, AIs give horrible results that prove that they do nothing else than automatically put words next to each other based on the likelihood of it making sense to humans.

They do not understand grammar just like they do not understand anything, they simply are an algorithm made to spit out “realistic” answers without having to actually understand them.

Another example of that is AIs that generate images: they’re full of nonsense because the AI doesn’t understand what it’s making, and that’s why you end up with weird artifacts that seem completely absurd to any human with basic understanding of reality.

Yeah no

Here come all the psychos who are going to justify it and say that it’s completely normal to throw pets as food.

Wow, I didn’t think there would be so many crazy psychos in the comments.

I can get that people might not feel as much empathy with animals than humans (get, not approve) but most of the comments are kitten-drowning level.

You get a pet, which is supposed to be a companion and basically part of your family, and you don’t mind them being torn to shreds?

Okay then, I guess if your kid has a terminal cancer we can also feed him to the tiger? After all in the end it’s just a bunch of meat.

Fascism is growing. New communication media are allowing for large scale, in-depth brainwashing.

People now strive more than ever to be part of the “norm” and eliminate all the rest. Capitalism keeps everyone so busy and self-centered that morals disappear. “Charismatic leaders” spearhead the new trends in a sect/religion approach.

It’s not stupidity of the masses. It’s an engineered death spiral, where the stupid people are the ones engineering it thinking that if it’s good for them, it is good.

Yeah, and people should have the right to say that you’re a worthless piece of shit as a consequence to that.

No it’s not. At most, you can use it combined (“male worker”) but no one normal says “a male” except when talking about animals. People who use it like that for humans are generally a big red flag.

And you don’t learn to use “mal” and “female” when you learn english, you only find that in toxic masculinity environments.

The good old red flag of talking about “males and females” instead of men and women like a normal person with a brain.

It’s a bit absurd to consider money and fame as success, unless you’re a crazy capitalist.

How is using a spoon different as to using a military tank? They’re both tools after all.

Look at how to do it with python, you’ll learn interesting stuff, get a working result, and not destroy your brain using a chat simulator as a programming help.

I don’t get why people are fine with comments that are as absurd as saying “to hang a painting, first stab a screwdriver in the wall then attach the painting to it, sometimes it’s not too bad”

Because politics are not science and people are very weird when it comes to children and education.

You cannot seriously believe that a country doing something gives it any kind of credibility, right?

Trans “treatments” (hormonal, surgery, etc) are one of the best remedies for a psychological issue. In medical views, the amount of people de-transitioning actually prove that the solution to gender disphoria and such (I easily get confused with the exact terms, apologies if I’m making a mistake with wording) is to let people transition.

In comparison, treatments for other problems (like depression, personality disorders, etc) are much much less successful.

The idea that transitioning should have a 100% satisfaction is absurd and coming from far-right propaganda.

So good people are doing this? Or trying to kick the “ugly” away isn’t evil, and is moray acceptable?

What’s your stance exactly?

It wouldn’t be good at it, it would at most be a little patch for non audited code.

In the end it would just be an AI-powered antivirus.

I don’t remember exactly, they were trying to package some dependencies they needed with guix and it was just a big headache.