

I actually loved this one, although the product placement was off the wall
I actually loved this one, although the product placement was off the wall
bitter mystery
No, I think he’s saying that it makes it more miserable and mysterious, but only for poor people, which he is not and therefore the status quo is good.
Jewish Voice for Peace
This was my immediate thought also, whatever part of me that is making the decision already exists so this is the same question as “would you want to stop existing now?” the answer to which is an emphatic “no.” I’d exist indefinitely given the choice.
I checked this dude out on notoriously Western aligned wikipedia and even they’re admitting that he spent six years working for ISIS along with his al-Nusra and al-Qaeda “service.”
The YouTube comments are all “oh finally a good moderate leader who will bring peace and democracy to Syria.” Disgusting.
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus
I pretty much always go ibuprofen, but aspirin is fine.
I’m pretty sure acetaminophen is snake oil though (this is a joke but I can’t recall ever having it resolve a headache for me like ibuprofen does).
Chapter 3 analyses a “boots on the ground” invasion (the occupation would require a draft)
Good luck, I’m defecting as soon as they don’t have eyes on me.
First ever actual preemptive strike.
Damn you post this dumb thing a lot.
A 2018 year-in-review and prospective on fact-checking from the Poynter Institute (which develops PolitiFact[25]) noted a proliferation of credibility score projects, including Media/Bias Fact Check, writing that “While these projects are, in theory, a good addition to the efforts combating misinformation, they have the potential to misfire,” and stating that “Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific.”[26] Also in 2018, a writer in the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as “an armchair media analysis”[27] and characterized their assessments as “subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in”.[28]
Wow that’s pretty damning, almost makes it seem like someone using this to shut down conversations by claiming media outlets are unreliable could be acting in bad faith. Like some kind of pro-Western, pro-Israel ideologue.
Label looks like this
I’m pretty sure it was Venture on an Atari.
Malt vinegar or that pepper sauce from steak n shake. Well the generic from the grocery store, but it’s the same thing.
Very unserious understanding of world politics.
Of course they’re viewed more positively in middle income than high income countries. The high income countries are all part of a global military alliance focused entirely on destroying communism and have fed their populations anti-communist propaganda for decades.
They’re one the main geopolitical adversaries of the political block that all the rich countries have formed, whereas they are investing in and helping develop poorer countries.
It is an absolute laugh though that all the countries that destroyed the Middle East over the last 30 years think China is a threat to world peace.
Democracy is when everything sucks and gets worse every year while centrists keep eyeing Nazis as possible better allies than the left.
If you force the government to improve society in any what you’re an “authoritarian” (oooh, how scary. btw, I’m pretty sure “authoritarian” as a cudgel against the left that equates them to the right is against board rules).
Peaceful revolution is when you burn 48 people alive in a building while a mob of neonazis keeps them from leaving.
Voluntary departure from where? The international waters, from which they were kidnapped?