Overrun? They were there first.

You’re data centers are the ones overrunning it

White nationalism? From the Dutch?! Who could have seen this coming?

Keir Starmer’s going to hang him out to dry for the same reason he’s been unleashing the British Gestapo on all those Grannies with “Palestine Action” banners.

Labor of love, I suspect

https://newpipe.net/

If a girl wants to play a sport for which there is a boys team but not girls team, she must be allowed to try out and participate on the same basis as the boys

Sure. And occasionally you get a girl to qualify. Sarah Fuller as the place kicker for Vanderbilt Commodores, for instance.

But the disparity in builds - particularly in a high contact sport like football - makes women qualifying virtually impossible.

So for example, if you cut funding to a boys team and parents more than make up the shortfall in donations and fundraising, it’s entirely possible based on that you might have to cut it further.

This was in response to early efforts to effectively privatize student athletics and freeze women’s sports out.

I’m sure it’s a matter of time before our current patriarchy fetish SCOTUS to reverse this out. But for the time being, you can’t just find a few mega-donors to create a “Private Men’s Club” on a public campus. What is ultimately being measured is access, which does get nebulous, but is necessarily the case when so many misogynists are intent on digging out loopholes to render Title XI toothless.

That would be the logical thing to do.

Although, even then no public school should be sponsoring full contact sports, full stop.

It’s been demonstrated within equality movements that statistical biological strength corresponding to sex does not always correspond to actual performance.

Depends heavily on the sport and the quality of coaching. Direct contact sports - football in particular - present real risks to the players when there’s a big disparity in size and strength.

But then there’s an argument that middle/high school contact sports shouldn’t be allowed to begin with, precisely because of the risk of injury.

Title IX requires gender equity in access and spending. It doesn’t strictly require women to access men’s sports, but it does require the school fully fund/admit women to equivalent in the abstract.

So, for instance, if you spend $100k/year on the boys-only football program, you need $100k dedicated to a girl accessible sport (typically volleyball or softball or soccer).

The kids WILL turn everything into a competition

In my experience, it’s the parents that need to make every Little League Rec scrimmage into the final game of the world series.

i think sport, exspecially in schools, should always be mixed

At the middle school age range, girls are typically bigger and stronger than their male peers. Boys don’t catch up until 14-16, at which point they rapidly put on height and mass to exceed their girl peers.

So deeply depressing when “anti-Semitism” is increasingly cover for “pro-fascism”.

Thank you

Continuing this off-site drama will result in temp bans for an three accounts

Normal Mod Behavior

Anyone who keeps up with British media wouldn’t be surprised.

Rationality is predicated on inputs and outputs. If you’re surrounded by second and third hand accounts of divine mysteries, it isn’t irrational to accept them as true absent some more compelling data. At least, no more irrational than believing in dinosaurs or the Big Bang Theory, without ever actually having seen a fossil or learned about the significance of background radiation.

I’m sorry if my post offended you.

ultimately lead to everyone being called a “Nazi

There’s two kinds of people who post this.

• People who are extremely naive and don’t understand the context of what they’re saying

• Actual fascists

I kiss yours