why not codeberg? kind of lightweight on JS, but especially compared to gitlab.

@Nundrum@yall.theatl.social

that would probably work. I think the IP does not need to be static, but there can be problems if your IP changes often, and it’s not updated quickly in DNS.

the only hard requirement for a local headscale (for usage over the internet) is that you are not behind a CG-NAT, and you can forward a port to your server in your router

but for the love of god and your own benefit, put a name constraint directly on the root cert

you don’t strictly need a VPS, what you need is a (mostly?) static IP address, that is especially not behind CG-NAT. if your ISP won’t give that to you, you get a VPS, because one of the most important jobs of headscale is NAT hole punching and patching your devices in

and how unambiguous is it that those are AI generated content? is it like blurry colors on images, 6 fingers and 3 hands, or what do you recognize on them?

I think I can identify generated images, but text… well I can’t even decide. Probably I just can’t so far, because I don’t remember any posts or comments that were suspicious

while dissing someone for not wanting AI in forums, for “not knowing what are they talking about”. right, they didn’t specify what kind of AI they don’t want, but I think it comes from the context that they don’t want generative AIs, because that’s what affects them negatively regularly

the first paragraph is not like in the post. did they rephrase it because of the “as it does” part?

this is the current version:

Tailscale recently announced our Series C fundraise. We were grateful for all the community support, but the Internet also raised a few of its collective eyebrows, wondering whether this meant the dreaded “enshittification” was coming next.

the internet archive does not show your version either: https://web.archive.org/web/20250702140430/https://tailscale.com/blog/evitability-of-enshittification

where did you get that quote from?

I don’t see it, which is horrific considering that others do. can you show a few examples that you think is AI slop?

let me get this straight. you like AI because a model outperformed another? how is that a real argument for any kind of question? the topic was not about whether they evolve.

that “black and white stance” is not really bad here, because it’s not actually black and white. their stance is against generative AI, not the kind you use for research. and guess what, forums are flooded by gen AI slop, the only kind of AI today that highly affects our forums.

I have this to open the site in archive.today:

javascript:void(open('http://archive.today/?run=1&url='+encodeURIComponent(document.location)))

I would love it if reddit management is so selfish that they dont care even about AI, but only their revenue.

wasp nest on a tree??

no, please rather don’t respond, especially not with an image, I don’t want to see it!

as I heard that’s pretty common at oracle, but it’s good to spread the word

I have not found an answer to this part:

I realized I just quoted the first 3 paragraphs of the post, so lets stay at the clarification. I haven’t found the answer to OPs question.

And to clarify what I don’t understand: each year flagship phone’s performance don’t seem to increase significantly. Regarding real world performance, not benchmarks.
That’s why the question is why don’t they keep the previous chipset until more meaningful gains. As OP suggested, they could either lower the price, or have more profit. Users would not feel the difference, and there’s plenty of other things the manufacturer can improve or experiment with.

If the concern is that people would say “ah it’s the same chipset!” and they wouldnt buy it, then the manufacturer could just replace that with another one that has roughly the same cost and performance.

they wanted answers about phone design practices, not cheaper phones.

the software that’s a bit bloated, but it’s (usually) removable (and you could always install a custom ROM)

except if your government and all available banks practically restrict you from replacing the ROM, because then their apps refuse to work. you often can’t replace gov apps with the web browser because of the closed authentication system, and bank apps either because they routinely block mobile browsers, while the desktop view is unusable for most people

its like you are responding to a different question. you are speaking about cheap phones, while the question was about recent years flagship phones chipsets.

what is that so large difference between this years flagship chip, and yesteryears flagship chip? and the difference between yezteryears and the one before that?
is it really a large difference, like reviewers tell? it feels like comparing intel 12th gen and 13th gen CPUs and telling there is a large difference, the newer ones are so much better you need to get them IMMEDIATELY.

again, the question is not about developments over a decade. bluetooth and gyroscope has been common for a decade now even in cheap phones.

and I find it amazing how hard they are locking down our phones, like as if it was still owned by the manufacturer, rented by the user. google is doing the most of the work to enable countries to forcibly lock in citizens to malware infested systems of the factory. it couldn’t have happened without something like play “protect”

the config and databases or the media, you mean?

if so, the former, but I mount the meadia with a read only docker volume just to be sure, because chances are I would never notice it

programming socks

you must have lots of LoTs