Black belt in Mikado, Photo model, for the photos where they put under ‘BEFORE’

  • 123 Posts
  • 466 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 25th, 2021

help-circle
  • There are also natural blue colors, but the problem isn’t the color, the problem is that in US food the color is artificial, because it’s cheaper than natural colors. If it is unhealthy, the industry give a fuck, important to gain more money. Collateral damages are nice for the friends from the pharma industry.

    Life expectancy in the US is more than 7 years lower than that of other first world countries. Too much stress, anxiety, crappy food with to much shugar and additives, inexistent healthcare. Capitalism kills



  • Well, anyway

    The military seeks female fighter pilots for three key strategic reasons:

    First, diversity in the cockpit enhances combat effectiveness. Different perspectives and approaches to problem-solving reduce groupthink and improve threat assessment. “Having people who have reached the exact same standards, but from a completely different origin, makes finding solutions a lot more efficient as a team,” according to military aviation experts[1].

    Second, the military needs to expand its talent pool amid pilot shortages. Air Force acquisition executive Will Roper explained: “When you’re a country that’s going to face a country with a population that’s four times your own…if we begin with a recruitment population that we’ve artificially halved because of how we design our cockpits and workstations, we’ve just doubled our work”[2].

    Third, cognitive diversity strengthens risk assessment and decision-making in high-stakes situations. Research shows diverse teams spot different threats in the same situation and communicate more effectively in safety-critical environments[1:1].


    1. Breaking Barriers: The Rise of Women Fighter Pilots ↩︎ ↩︎

    2. To get more female pilots, the Air Force is changing the way it designs weapons ↩︎
















  • IQ is a relative measure, pretending to be the % of the normal level of a individual in a similar age, in resumen: Relative to what or whom?. Intelligence isn’t medible directly, because it isn’t a objective value, depending on the test, it isn’t only the capability to solve problems, it’s also the capability to interact with others, emphatic capability, kinetic capabilities. Eg. Newton maybe was a genios with an IQ of 190 in Science and Math, but in interactions with others stupid like a brick (Asperger syndrom)