I think they meant the giver.

You can’t trick me, I know a bullet hell when I see one.

(Not my art)

Find a partner for yourself which looks similar to Crush, replace their wardrobe with virtually identical clothes to Crush, along with haircut, perfume, etc.

Constantly visit shops close to Crush’s house, so it’s “coincidence” when you bump into Crush and Partner.

From there, before they can talk their way out of an awkward situation, joke about how they look like twins, and that fantasy has always appealed to you.

OK!

SAY IT WITH ME NOW!

WHEN I SAY “BARBARA” YOU SAY “STREISAND”!

READY?!

" BARBARA "

Because.

The problem is that the “thing” is either:

• never have I ever done this <thing> or
• <never have I ever done this thing>

That’s what OP is saying. The wording could be clearer.

Essentially, if you can relate to what the comment says, then downvote.

Never have I ever heard “I’m proud of you” from my Dad :'(

I think that makes you amnesic

Gnostic / Agnostic is simply a claim about knowledge.

I’m agnostic as to whether my bread is stale. (I don’t know if my bread is stale).

I’m gnostic about the planets shape (I know it’s a sphere).

Theist / Atheist is a claim about belief.

Every person fits into one of the following:

• A Gnostic Theist claims to know God exists (therefore implicitly believing)

• A Gnostic Atheist claims to know God doesn’t exist.

• An Agnostic Theist believes in God but doesn’t have sufficient evidence to make definitive claims.

• An Agnostic Atheist doesn’t have sufficient evidence to make claims about God, and therefore doesn’t believe.

In terms of rationale, both Gnostic groups make definitive claims without sufficient evidence and should not be trusted.

The Gnostic Theists believe in something without evidence, this is a fallacy, but it’s something we all do every day. For example, I don’t know if it will rain, but I believe it might, so I bring an umbrella.

An Agnostic Atheist is the most rational. If you don’t have sufficient evidence to make a definitive claim, then why would you believe it?

People are fucking idiots about this kind of shit.

Hey, what the fuck.

This was my profile picture before you posted it.

Look, at some point, you gotta stop prefacing everything you say with a disclaimer which appeals to .01% of the population.

If you’re a biological female attracted to men and feminine breasts, the common shorthand is “bisexual”.

Sorry, not sorry

Would like an easy way to remember.

• mnt = mount
• opt = optional ?
• etc = etcetera ?
• proc = process ?
• srv = server ?
• var = variable ?

“Conservatives”:

Oh no, you’re going to make me be that guy lol.

Ricing comes from “rice cooker”, meaning a Japanese car. The term is so far removed from any racial implications now, that some people say RICE means “Race Inspired Cosmetic Enhancements”, though it’s just an excuse where one need not exist.

I regularly see people brigade for others to stop saying it, even though the word now exists on its own. People treat it like it’s comparable to something like the Washington “Redskins”, it isn’t.

“Ricing”

Uh oh, you said the forbidden word. Won’t be long until everyone in this thread is “informed”.

What you’re referring to as GNUI, is in fact GNUI/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNUI plus Linux.