Synth noodling conceptual artist

  • 0 Posts
  • 93 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 27th, 2023

help-circle

  • I do find it interesting that folk think Renaissance art is realistic.

    I’m being a little glib, but the truth is that we are still looking at hyper-idealised bodies.

    The main difference,I suspect, is the use of perspective rather than drawing on a flat plane. In a way it took a leap of imagination to make things look more “realistic” whilst sculpture was merely (again, said with a certain smirk) just mimicking what the artist could see and feel in the real world.

    That is to say that sculpture is reproduction whilst drawing is representation, and with representation you need to be able to take some pretty big leaps for both the artist and the viewer to work these things out.









  • The devil is in the details. Different contracts state different usages.

    Often, I’m hired to make things for folk, and they own it entirely. I see these things out in the world, I sometimes see other artists hired to butcher it to fit a new purpose. But that’s OK, I account for that, and often I hand over the source files from the things I make… Layered documents etc.

    However, there’s a really disturbing trend of large companies appropriating fan art and claiming that because they own the IP any derivatives belong to them too. This is far ickier.

    The main thing though is credit. You’d think that giving a nod to the original artist would be nice. It costs nothing and can have a massive impact on their business.



  • I’m telling you this as someone that works in the arts, that’s just not true.

    You can pirate digital material and repackage it. I see illustrators getting their designs ripped off by large scale clothing manufacturers all the time.

    Similarly, I know some acts that have heard their music on adverts and films and haven’t been paid. It seems like it is being stolen if you ask me.

    There needs to be protection or the creation of art becomes a luxury for those that can afford to not make money from it.






  • As someone who makes minimum wage from my intellectual property, the IP laws (in the UK) have allowed me to prevent the very wealthy just taking my ideas and profiting from them.

    And they have tried repeatedly.

    It isn’t the law, but the corruption of the law that’s at issue. However, without that legal framework there would be no financial incentive for anyone but the wealthy to make IP.

    Is that what you want? Entertainment by big corporations only, and art made solely by the upper middle classes?