Logseq has genuinely made me a less stupid person. It’s confusing to learn, but the ceiling for articulating and organising your thoughts and knowledge base is insanely high. Other apps kind of feel like I’m fighting the limitations of my tools in order to organise a mental library of where to find information.

I read the headline and my immediate thought was “is this controlled for socioeconomic class?”

I guess I’m reading the paper

First case; you cannot counter (in practice i.e. having an effect) the intolerant philosophies seen on these instances using rational argument as they do not appeal to rational thought. And because of this, not despite it, public opinion allows inhumane indignities to be acted upon marginalised demographics.

If you believe I used the term incorrectly please say so. Your phrasing comes off as you’re someone who knows a thing, and wants everyone else to know they know.

You are aware that defederating from an instance won’t stop individual users from that instance joining yours?

To be honest your view on things seems far too innocent, like paradox of tolerance manifest. What you desire is something that’s fought for and fiercely defended. The rest of the internet should serve evidence for why we can’t just have nice things.

Also did you look at the instances in question yourself?

This is a whataboutist counterpoint at best. Universities and their researchers are not a monolith.

I suppose I’ll be watching two pile of snakes pretending to be people for the duration of which this plays out.

In my case I was ecosystem’d into RPM and Flatpak, so openSUSE makes me happy

That’s a very interesting anecdote, now that you say it

I feel like a lot of people are missing the point when it comes to the MIST. I just very briefly skimmed the paper.

Misinformation susceptibility is being vulnerable to information that is incorrect

• @ach@feddit.de @GataZapata@kbin.social It seems that the authors are looking to create a standardised measure of “misinformation susceptibility” that other researchers can employ in their studies so that these studies can be comparable, (the authors say that ad-hoc measures employed by other studies are not comparable).
• @lvxferre@lemmy.ml the reason a binary scale was chosen over a likert-type scale was because
  1. It’s less ambiguous to participants
  2. It’s easier for researchers to implement in their studies
  3. The results produced are of a similar ‘quality’ to the likert scale version
• If the test doesn’t include pictures, a source name, and a lede sentence and produces similar results to a test which does, then the simpler test is superior (think about the participants here). The MIST shows high concurrent validity with existing measures and states a high level of predictive validity (although I’d have to read deeper to talk about the specifics)

It’s funny how the post about a misinformation test was riddled with misinformation because no one bothered to read the paper before letting their mouth run. Now, I don’t doubt that your brilliant minds can overrule a measure produced with years of research and hundreds of participants off the top of your head, but even if what I’ve said may be contradicted with a deeper analysis of the paper, shouldn’t it be the baseline?

Then just write proprietary code. Open source philosophy to me seems about creation for a “greater good”. What’s the point if you’re not even going to be open? The organisation just becomes a massive corporation like any other at that point.

That depends on whether the communication channel is encrypted.

Reddit is ProCSS

A world without advertising and marketing is a world without persuasion. These two concepts by themselves were never the problem, as they’re just a means to increase awareness and demand for a product or service. To me it seems that you instead take issue with a consumerist society.

Fedora, I’m not a tech person by Linux user standards and I just need an OS that works