

I would second all of this, except for the suggestion to delete it. It’s a common question.
To reiterate, “biologically male” means very little scientifically. Sex in biology is far more complicated than most people understand.
It doesn’t matter, because when we discuss gender socially, we’re not describing reproductive capabilities. We don’t stop calling women women when they go through menopause, for instance.
If someone wants to debate it, say no thanks. It’s a waste of your time. If someone asks in good faith, you can explain it if you feel capable, or shrug and say you’re not really sure, but it doesn’t matter.





This is a really interesting question that people aren’t taking seriously.
It’s a huge mix. Because one of the key features of wealth and privilege is freedom: these people get to do more or less whatever they want.
For some, that’s whatever their parents do. Maybe they just want to make money and have martini lunches. But for a lot of them, they may just want to be a gaming YouTuber or a marine biologist, or a even run a social-justice focused non-profit.
As much as most of us resent unearned privilege, there’s no rule that says people who lucked into life are all stupid, mean, or incompetent. Many will become successful academics or devote themselves to politically righteous causes. The main problem is not what they do, but all the human potential among the unprivileged that is denied and squandered.
Many may also move between careers; etsy store one year, writer another. It’s very fluid.