Not ideologically pure.

  • 4 Posts
  • 223 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 8th, 2024

help-circle









  • I’m gonna say yes, for the exercise.

    Four assumptions:

    1. Reddit will keep getting worse, due to the nature of enshittification and venture capital. Eventually enshittification reaches a breaking point where people leave or stop arriving.
    2. Lemmy (in a broad sense - et al!) will keep getting better, due to.the nature of open source software.
    3. Non-free alternatives to Reddit will eventually enshittify, law of enshittification.
    4. Free alternatives will use ActivityPub for the obvious advantages.

    If these assumptions are met, given infinite rounds of enshittification and unhappy users, eventually a federated and free alternative will be the most lucrative option for the majority of users. Eventually Reddit will Digg itself a hole. Maybe Lemmy won’t take over then, but it’ll stick around.

    The most unrealistic assumption is of course that the federated solutions will keep getting better indefinitely. Maybe they won’t. But as long as people keep developing and contributing to the Fediverse, it’s alive and improving in a way commercial alternatives cannot in the long run compete with.






  • I find this to be incredibly interesting. It’s like 2016 saw online polarization, but it happened on the same platforms. Today, there’s a polarizations of platforms - we exist in different realities online.

    I wonder if this split would have happened anyway, or if it was motivated by American politics. And I wonder what the consequences are.

    It seems like a pretty fundamental development in how our information channels work, and I haven’t seen it been discussed much by commentators.

    Maybe my question cannot be answered because ‘online’ today just means something completely different than it did in 2016.




  • I don’t think that’s the question I try to ask, though I probably struggle to formulate myself well. It’s not really about comparing to Harris.

    It seemed that Trump engaged a lot of people who would not usually bother with politics in 2016. He ran a campaign that completely dominated the Internet. People seemed to have nothing better to do than to create right wing memes in half serious, half joking support of him.

    I don’t see that any more. What I see is a more normal campaign ran by a guy frequently making fascist talking points. He could still win, and maybe it’s still a successful campaign, but it feels very different to me from the 2016 one.

    But then again, I have changed my Internet habits so that I wouldn’t see it anyway. Maybe there’s still hordes of 20-something incels posting frog memes for the masses to be offended by, it’s just off my radar.


  • I can’t even enter Truth Social from Europe. I see Wikipedia estimates 600 000 monthly active users, which is of course a lot. But I struggle to wrap my head around how important it can be. Isn’t it potentially a bit self defeating for them to close themselves off in a closed forum?

    The Trump subreddit in 2016 seemed to have a cultural impact. Truth Social seems to be more of a footnote?

    In a way Twitter is bad enough, but my impression there before deleting my account was that most of the Trump spam was Musk posts that appeared on my profile for no good reason.