It means they dislike the people that brand themselves as woke.

It’s like asking anti-AI people their opinion on support vector machines - you’ll rarely get an informed answer.

Spite

Seeing a hate preacher stop hate preaching is a good thing that bad people are pretending is a bad thing.

That’s not what happened though. The message got amplified by the way this murder happened, and the cheeryness of how many people reacted.

If the self-proclaimed good guys repeatably celebrate violence over dialogue, then there’s no good, nor a need for dialogue. A valid conclusion were the premise true. Yet a message that’s now loudly shared.

There will be radical people like that.

Sounds like the reverse is happening instead, no?

It’s hard to assign a name to a negative, as the alternatives are so plenty. Maybe describe the improvements you might like?

I, for one, like the ideas of liquid democracy.

Amethyst

Homicide changes to murder with the criminal’s intent. Murder moves to assasination when the intent is to dictate one’s opinion over others using lethal violence.

Great example of slippery slope privacy invasion in action. These stingray device were introduced for “counter terrorism” because who would support terrorists.

It’ a didactic tool for people to whom smalltalk doesn’t come instinctively.

The FORD method can be helpsome

It means future communications will go easier, as you learn what kind of person they are and how they think

Stock raspberry os and syncthing sounds like the easiest way to do this.

Everyone is like that to some degree. “Pure evil” people don’t exist, neither do “pure good” people.

I also dislike graphana kabana elastic behemot.

You can use rsyslog to centralize the logs. Then there’s tools like this for anomaly detection on those logs.

A small application I wrote myself, hosted on the free tier of pythonanywhere.com

Uptime monitoring and notifications

Eureka

Do you think people are born as “fucking assholes”, or shaped that way by their environment?

But I don’t really see an answer to the question

That question being:

I just want to understand where the critics are coming from.

To repeat my answer: It comes from a lack of empathy, as it’s easier to downplay a problem than to take it seriously.

Whenever a statistic isn’t fair towards a group, be it income, housing, … corrective measures are being implemented. Unless that group is men, such as the homelessness, suicide, incarceration, lower education, … Then it’s seen as “normal” due to “toxic men”.