My point is that old doesn’t automatically mean incompatible. Especially with stuff like games.

Because you’re mistaken about how compatibility works

In what way?

“Suspect” is the noun

Of course. Why would they complain about that? She’s on their team.

…wat

Sounds to me like you are the one who doesn’t believe in democracy… because that’s not my take.

You sure changed your tune quick! What happened to this not being likely? What happened to it being pointless to block voting for criminals because they simply wouldn’t be that silly?

I believe in democracy. But I also believe in education - and you guys over there in the US aren’t good at either of those things. You have a corrupt, shambolic democracy and a failing education system that churns out dumb, blind followers to feed it.

Keep reaching for further and further strawmen

It’s not a strawman. You think a minimum age is “pointless” because “no one would actually vote for a child”. I transplanted that exact argument into a situation I knew would showcase its absurdity.

Proving you wrong isn’t a fallacy!

Democracy requires majorities of people to do anything.

Majorities can be misled. Surely you’re aware of this?

A few people voting for nonsense options doesnt do anything.

It’s not “a few people” though. Trump is actively and increasingly popular despite his obvious crimes.

A few people murdering actually kills people.

A bloc of fanatics actually gets their way when organised. That’s democracy.

If youre worried a majority of people will choose a nonsense option, well then you dont believe in democracy anymore.

Now that’s a fallacy - A false dichotomy, AKA a black and white fallacy.

According to you, there are only two options:

1. I believe people only ever vote rationally.

2. I don’t believe in democracy.

This is absurd.

This is extremely naive. In the same vein, I suppose there’s no point in keeping murder illegal, since people should just know not to do that.

I think a ban on voting for 2 year olds would be pointless.

Jesus, dude… smh my head. It’s not a specific ban. It’s a minimum age, you doofus. Stop sidestepping the question.

Do you agree that acceptable limits are possible?

You’re still refusing to see the point.

Do you think not allowing 2 year olds to run is an infringement on democracy?

If not, then you agree that there are acceptable limits.

…no??? But he did!

So, you see the problem with your point, yet are still trying to make that point. How… curious?

Why exactly do you want to vote for a treasonous insurrectionist? Why should such a person be allowed to run?

Do you really think it’s undemocratic to protect democracy from someone approaching fascism?

This was a great read. Thanks for sharing your experience of your first computer.

Lmao yet another person who thinks TDS is a real thing, and not just a lie Trump simps tell themselves

What happened March-May?

Yeah that’s what I’m saying, dude… they care more about finding weird porn than actual investigation

You’re missing the joke - that they had instead found the video during regular masturbation. They didn’t say anything about whether or not to report crimes to the cops