1·
1 year agoEuchre can be gambled on right? So at least there is some angle where it’s “undesirable”.
- 0 Posts
- 11 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 11th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
297·1 year agoMost people complaining have two weeks of user data…
Eh its a meme at this point. Everyone knows to what you’re referring and recognises the shared experience of overconfident stupid people. Everyone educated on the topic understands that it’s a pop psychological misrepresentation of some very interesting work.
I wouldn’t say it shows a lack of education. If anything it’s more prevalent in populations that have had an excess of a certain type of unhelpful “executive” education.
It’s not a culture fair observation to be sure. Your Nobel prize winners I guess we’re old (hence part of a generation when smoking was more widespread). There are also countries where smoking is more or less universal.
This is how I managed to fix the same apparent issue.
It is illogical, not to mention callous. And yet the exaggerated rhetoric persists and whips up negative sentiment towards literal life savers from braindead segments of the far right.
They’re wrong about encouraging fleeing too (as if that even needed saying) as I’ve pointed out elsewhere on the thread.
Why do you believe this? It’s never been evidenced. Read the section “CRIMINALIZATION OF SEA RESCUE NGOS: A SMEAR CAMPAIGN” in this.
Ah and I’m sure you have a source for these “facts” and I’m sure they will stand up in court. It’s not like the Italian government would just bring unsustainable allegations for political reasons.
Seeing people suggesting that rescue efforts encourage more people to take the risk of crossing. Not true if you look at the data.
these results strongly suggest that…the absence of SAR operations…has little or no effect on the number of arrivals
deleted by creator
6·1 year agoIt’s kinda poetic for them to go down next to the titanic, itself a story of complacency and excess/opulance.
And most often high costs mean higher ROI. The wind farm doesn’t get continued funding precisely because it produces electricity when supply is high and hence prices are low. Electricity is not worth the same at all times; you can sell your coal fired watts when the wind speeds are low and the unit price jumps up. Instead of trying to solve the hard problem of storing electricity to fill the intermittency gap, capitalism takes the easy way out of burning fossil fuels unless you force it not to by regulating.