Senior software guy. Android app/system, cloud, DevOps, IoT, embedded, automotive.
Yes. Countries where the observable reality aligns closer with the official message. The more divergence, the higher the importance of the official message to be heard and uncontradicted, in order to maintain the shared reality within the country. The closer the message to what people see and feel around them, the less important the message is.
For example, in a country where people make ends meet with great difficulty it would take persistent message that the economy is doing well to convince them in that. People can see that it’s difficult to make ends meet. If the official message stops contradicting that reality, the reality will become more apparent. In contrast in a country where people have high disposable income and the official message on the economy is that things are doing well, the two align. If the official message stops, the reality keeps being the same, people keep noticing that they’re doing well. And so the official message wouldn’t significantly affect the shared reality among the people of that country. Therefore it isn’t as important. Reality speaks for itself if you will.
This guy risk-rewards.
That won’t change anything. The financial incentives from investors driving this will demand similar policies even if they get redressed in different marketing.
80/20, Lemmy/Reddit.
Trending to 100/0.
It’s a planned feature if I’m not mistaken.
Great, so it’s reproducible and Lemmy-the-app related, not instance-specific. Should be fixable across the board once it’s identified and resolved.
Does this behaviour appear on other big instances? E.g. lemmy.ml?