Damm, I legit didn’t knew there bcrypt had a length limit! Thank you for another reason not to use bcrypt
Damm, I legit didn’t knew there bcrypt had a length limit! Thank you for another reason not to use bcrypt
Also rate of the requests. A normal user isn’t sending a 1 MiB password every second
Why are you hasing in the browser?
Also, what hashing algorithm would break with large input?
The problem is that you (hopefully) hash the passwords, so they all end up with the same length.
Oh, I already hated windows, that was just the last straw
The pandemic and programming.
I was watching some tutorials and saw how easily people used the terminal, and how clunky cmd felt.
Next day I had ubuntu running.
While it’s true that’s a progess bar is guessing (since it doesn’t know what would take more time in your computer). It should still finish when at 100%
Yes, it’s the Pon Farr, that makes Vulkans have blood fever. The episode you are talking about is Amok Time
we ended up not needing infinitely regrowable teeth
Even if they do have the same in-memory representation, you may want to assert types as different just by name.
AccountID: u64
TransactionID: u64
have the same in-memory representation, but are not interchangeable.
“src/utils/typing: added tests for isArray”
we have 90% coverage minimum
I don’t know how luxon works, but isWeekend could be a property instead of a function
I’d say 128 is understandable, but something like 256 or higher should be the limit. 64, however, is already bellow my default in bitwarden