

Lemmy can be as simple if not simpler than that:
- “Hey, Lemmy is a bit like Reddit, have a look at <link to your instance>”
- they can have a browse, no download required
- If they want to join, enter email, username, and password
- Verification email
Lemmy can be as simple if not simpler than that:
Na don’t worry, I raised an issue and the developer confirmed it was a bug, so you did everything right, no need to post the link twice!
I was about to say “what article?” because this is just an image post, but then I opened this in the web ui and apparently there’s a linked post that my client isn’t showing!
Defed Investigator seems pretty useful
Exactly. As I posted on a different thread I’m no fan of Apple but they’re probably one of the few companies with the balls and the sway to tell governments to fuck off, but I’m already worried how many other companies have already rolled over and how many more will if more governments start demanding this shit.
Today me, tomorrow you. Other countries are itching to enforce the same shit, don’t let it happen to you!
Are you posting an advert, new account with no post or comment history?
Sadly the article is very light on how this actually works. I’m guessing it involves setting up an authenticator on the phone (something they encourage anyway) and just using a QR code as a new way of interacting with it?
I think you’re looking for !cartographyanarchy@lemm.ee
No I meant that it’s reasonable for Debian to have waited a while even though other distros have already dropped support
Typing it starting with an doesn’t resolve for me but !fediversenews@venera.social does
Probably a technical consideration (like what if they have an edit timestamp which would allow a dedicated person to find all the comments unlinked at the exact same time), a personal consideration (what if you actually want that information purged as thoroughly as possible), and a legal consideration (sounds like it violates the GDPR)
Data privacy (the “right to be forgotten”) I’d say is the main reason. Say you realise that you’ve built up a little to much linkable information about yourself over the years and don’t want it readily available for whoever might want to make use of it.
Interesting idea, but how do you decide on what the universally-agreed on reactions are? Have too many and they may as well just be comments!
I’ve tried KDE Plasma Mobile on an old Surface Pro and it seemed to work better than Gnome
I remember that being a problem back on Reddit (though I always found people upvoting low-effort stuff that wasn’t community/sub-appropriate to be more of a problem). It’s kind of a site-wide UX issue though really, if a new casual user is just presented with a list of posts then they might genuinely be unaware of (or perhaps just uninterested in) where they came from and what their votes mean.
Oh. If the only thing stopping the votes being public is a label saying pretty please don’t make this public then it does seem very open to abuse.
Some people might think it’s not interesting because it’s not appropriate content for that community, and that by downvoting they are improving the quality for everyone. I don’t think every instance/community has a unified consensus on how exactly to use voting, and some people are always going to do their own thing regardless.
If you’d only ever interacted with Lemmy and not read up on how ActivityPub works then that’s a reasonable assumption, it’s not like anything (that I’ve noticed!) actually tells you that your votes are public, and they don’t look to be public in the places you’re likely to see!
There are so many bad defaults to deal with. For instance I can remove Google Photos and try to communicate with Signal, but when I need to use a group chat which is still in WhatsApp then any photos posted there are probably being auto-uploaded on the recipient’s phone.