• 100 Posts
  • 572 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 9th, 2023

help-circle




  • These easily outclass any IFVs russia has left or can make brand new. Personally, I would much rather be in one of these than even a russian main battle tank.

    Crucially these build on the undeniable design success of the M2 Bradley formula. Same general size, tracked, armed and armored to fight not just transport troops and properly focused on a rear ramp for getting infantry OUT alive.

    Comparing russian armored designs to a Lynx is like putting a child’s fingerpainting next to a famous Monet piece.












  • It is not working.

    These Turtle Tanks are niche designs focused on countering drones. This class of armor is best thought of as improvised heavy mineclearing vehicles, but they aren’t tanks.

    What these Turtle vehicles gain in imperviousness to FPV drone attacks they catastrophically give up in situational awareness and vulnerability to all other anti-tank weapons whether that be direct fire cannons tank cannons, artillery, AT guided rockets or physical tank traps.

    Does anyone else feel like tanks were unquestionably obsolete when Russia stopped using them and now that Russia is using them again tanks are unquestionably powerful?








  • Well, as Sweden replaces their older Gripens with new ones I am sure they will let Ukraine get started training with and using the older ones as soon as possible.

    A great way to get actual combat experience without risking too much is running shahed/ground attack missile interception missions deep behind friendly lines so in that sense Russia is already providing a great training environment for Ukrainian pilots.

    I think this is one of the underappreciated negatives to Russia’s strategy of flooding Ukrainian skies with targets, they are training a ton of Ukrainians to be very good at shooting shit out of the sky and that will continue to backfire for decades on Russia.

    Are the Russian pilots getting as much practice? How could they? Russia’s economy is in large part focused on pumping out target training drones for Ukraine to shoot down, there is no way they can be providing their pilots and AA defense crews with as thorough and extensive training, it would be impossible materially for them. It is only recently that Ukraine has begun hitting targets with flying bombs all over Russia, but they will never provide the equivalent training opportunity because Ukraine isn’t trying to brute force terrorize a civilian population with indiscriminate flying bomb strikes into surrender.

    Russia thinks it is proving to the world that manned systems are obsolete and their industrial capacity to create mass terror civilian-targeting flying bombs trumps everything, but they are really just providing Europe with the next generation of air defense training at the expense of Russia’s future.

    I have a feeling Gripens will be entering the picture sooner than this timeline indicates due to that fact.



  • I mean, that is a LOT of jets, 3 years isn’t that long for such a massive aquisition.

    What this says to me is these military industrial powers are confident Russia is unable to radically change the momentum of the war and are thinking 10 years down the road to the next step of war for Russian imperialism.

    I am not sure how much that future war is feasible for Russia anymore though.

    All that being said, yes it is infuriating, nobody is a pawn to be pushed around in geopolitics and I totally get Ukrainians being exasperated by this nonsense.






  • Go read the way some people on /r/credibledefense on reddit (NOT lemmy/fediverse) talk about helping Ukraine, some of these assholes openly admit they support slow walking aid to Ukraine to hurt Russia maximally. They treat this like a board game with abstracted plastic pieces moving around, it is disgusting. They say it outloud too, speaking to Ukrainian lives as if they were good trades for geopolitical gains.

    I don’t see intentional malice in it, it is just defense focused people in the US tend to have a baby level understanding of the world and have had their brain broken by conservatism to the point they can’t think critically about how their words and actions may be received.







  • I guess, but the US tried to screw over Ukraine by giving them tanks without giving them enough artillery to properly support heavy armored maneuver. It is equivalent to handing someone a knight’s helmet and shield but no sword or suit armor… sure it helps but it isn’t what they probably asked for in terms of being armed for self defense and I mean… ok sure the shield is nice but… what? Why? Did you want to technically help them while still letting them fail or at least struggle to win?




  • “Embarassing” seems a flippant response but I don’t know what other one to have, this is so far past “brutal”, “senseless” and “needlessly violent”. War at a baseline is senseless, but this? What do you even call this?

    I honestly think this will be remembered as one of the largest military blunders of modern history, the scale and ineffectiveness of Russia’s strategy is staggering and military historians all over the world will use the Russian side of this war as the obvious touchstone to speak to how not to fight a war.