mind expanding on what these solve?
mind expanding on what these solve?
may we get some pointers on what did you start with?
The fact that I didn’t notice the end of your post, and started mindlessly scrolling through the Related Posts is hilarious and sadly ironic.
isn’t this a good change though?
This is what made YouTube rabbit holes fun a few years ago. Now we’re all in our own echo chambers.
how is the image related?
It’ll always be a mystery what Kenny says. Seriously, people understand him?
Alternatively, pressing 0 can be quite easy.
Using the first entry for steal
on the English wiktionary:
To take illegally, or without the owner’s permission, something owned by someone else without intending to return it.
So, if you can’t actually own stuff, you can’t (by definition) steal it.
I get your point, and this more of an AcKsHuALly type of argument, but it’s an fun way of begging the question of what “I own this” means in today’s society.
thought about it, too!
(and… not sure if it’s Jerboa, but the image appears emoji-sized to me. a bite-sized comic, hehe)
that toast must really be evil…
being flooded with links with clickbait-y titles. back in may more posts were organic.
edit: what communities have good content made by users? i seldom find intriguing discussion on comments, but few posts are engaging on their own.
Kagi says parthenogenesis hasn’t happened in humans, but that’s the only way I can think of a child being an identical copy of its parent (mother-daughter, specifically).
Which implies Jesus is trans.
I raise to you: Ladybug.
Any polyrhythm suggestions?
i find it cool in the sense of how it’s a portrayal of all languages being somewhat synthetic. how other conlangs have tried to play with language features is how i landed on Jan Misali’s YT channel (here’s his Esperanto episode).
esperanto per-se i haven’t learnt because… maybe because I wouldn’t have anyone to practice with, and the point of languages is communication? idk.
Duolingo maybe be a good start for the theory, how did you start getting practice? and more importantly, what’s this about rent-free Esperanto hostels? 👀👀
at that point I start recycling them, and go back to parenthesis.
so when bp = 300x - 3, this:
4( 4[ 4{ 15bp + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000
would turn to
4( 4[ 4{ 15( 300x - 3) + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000
perhaps not the best, but I rather stick to conventional symbols rather than using… idk, question marks? that’d be funny as hell, though
just picture it:
4© 4« 4¿ 15bp + 10 ? - 375 » - 2250 🄯 - 15000