Yggstyle

I always loved the simple statement that:

Death is inevitably caused by swallowing tiny bits of saliva over time.

It illustrated the utter senseless linking of observed events to results with dubious research. Is it technically wrong? No. Is it correct? Of course not. (I hope.)

We are constantly being sold something. Sometimes it’s obvious - other times it’s not. Frequently its a bent truth to just nudge us in the direction the advertiser wants. Health is extraordinarily complicated. We know we should be healthy - but there is so much noise potential profit in the space… that it becomes hard to determine the correct path to take.

Shit like the above is effectively tabloid journalism. If it is sensationalist - and urging you to act without thought … you absolutely should give it as much credence as an article about bat boy in the checkout line. Until these pseudo journalism “half-truth” adverts get degraded to tabloid levels they will continue to pollute our information channels with their snake oil.

It is possible to distill correct - or at least better information from questionable sources: we play the overlapping circle game. If you compare multiple sources of partial truth… each source added can begin to define the boundaries of what is true (or at least accepted as truth.) Now this isn’t perfect and certainly doesn’t replace real research - but this method in combination with learning to identify masked advertising is a way to protect yourself from falling prey to their trash.

What’s to be done about this shoddy reporting? When you see it - call it out for what it is. Shame the publisher. Trash the poster. Openly mock them. Do what you can to tarnish the perceived reputation of that outlet. If they sell sewage then make sure the stink sticks to them. Enough people doing this will start a positive feedback loop and eventually lead to visible improvements.

Military signups are dipping. This is an appeal to the young and stupid which is the lifeblood of the armed forces grunts. Need meat for the grinder.

It’s been done before and will be done again each generation.

“That’s bait”

It’s both.

Yes. Without question.

And some CEOs are FAR worse than others.

But rarely better than the worst person you know.

I had this as my take away too. I could personally give two shits about his or any others creators userbase / content - I think that if we want Linux adoption rates up it’s always welcome when it is talked about.

Gravy seals needed a part time job.

Funnily enough that was the one in the list I least reacted to. It’s all subjective I’d imagine: It’s all nonsense, without question… but they all still technically fit the bill.

I mean the first two I’d give a pass.

It’s like “Yeah that bad thing is good, actually” - which is pretty standard fare for an onion article. Not exciting by any stretch but it technically qualifies.

…And the plane is just funny. Not as a taxpayer, per se - but objectively would get someone to do a double take.

To be fair some of said stories genuinely could have been onion articles… In what sane world would we deport a 4 year old resident with cancer? How is that an actual headline? The times this year I’ve had to double check is astonishing.

Came in expecting league: was not disappointed. Welcome fam- Never a better time to join the club.

I dropped it for similar reasons… initially I got tired of fighting with devs over false flags on vm usage. Never lost a case but it seriously was just the stupidest hoop to jump through.

Found the corporate shill guys. 🙄

You probably don’t self-report to them about your actions though ;)

This. Works flawlessly for obscuring filesharing from your provider and supports multiple connections. I’ve got the router splitting traffic across 4 different nodes and it’s a good balance of speed and security.

Personally, any provider that is selling a VPN and is feigning this holier than thou attitude shouldn’t be trusted with anything. If they are looking that hard at your traffic - I doubt they’d bat an eye at giving your data to anyone asking. Fuck that.

Yeah - I hear that. I wouldn’t say “don’t speak up” so much as don’t just speak up. Speak up but also work the system as it is, Losing the vote to somebody like Trump is counter-productive, maintaining the status quo would have been better even if it’s still imperfect.

That’s a fair statement. I just wanted to draw attention to the fact that the current administration hadn’t won as a result of the failure of the voters on the other side so much as the aligning of a series of events. Too many people are simply making statements like well you didn’t vote hard enough… which simply ignores reality.

I’m thinking more of Trump’s first campaign which set this all in action. That’s when he was truly still an outsider.

I believe we are aligned I this thought. It’s their club and outsiders are a threat.

Other than that I think we mostly agree.

Cheers. This has been a fun exchange minus the earlier confusion. Appreciate you sticking it out to clarify 👊

I agree that we should have a more multi-party system. Period. Good idea - lets do it. But we don’t have one.

Solid. I assumed we were on the same page - but was struggling to figure out where things were misaligning.

So how do you effect change? Pitch a fit and claim the system is unfair and scream into the void? Or find a way within the existing system to change it? The latter is what I mean by “playing the game”.

I feel, personally, that it needs to be a bit of both. If people don’t speak up it’s difficult for others to find they may not be so alone in their views. Discontent needs to be visible and heard to start a movement. Sadly (as shown in the video referenced - and in recent elections) simply “playing the game” has resulted in this death spiral we appear to be in. What is to be done? Disproportionately congress is still occupied by boomers who refuse to pass the torch and tragically are out of touch with reality. Gen X and Millennials make up very few seats thanks to the death grip held on many of these seats. They’re old so you need to speak up ;) Jokes aside - to gain any traction on subjects such as these we need to be vocal.

Hard-line racists conservatives have been similarly disillusioned as liberals about the two party system, both feeling unrepresented. The conservatives worked within the system to elect Trump who is effectively a 3rd party candidate within a 2 party system by co-opting one of the parties.

I disagree somewhat here. I believe both parties put a fairly significant effort into their particular candidate.

I firmly believe that Biden had 0 interest in running again but was talked into it. As I suggested earlier the majority of votes were lost to the candidate change at the 11th hour. Additionally the vote of the disillusioned groups you are (in part) referring to was due to swing to the Republican side this election, and did. Lastly, what I view as the final nail in the coffin was the efforts of “outside” influences resulting in the fragmentation and alienation of a number of social groups typically more aligned in their stance. Combine these factors and you get the overwhelming outcome we saw.

I will give you the “third party” dash of spice present on the grifter which clearly did draw some additional votes - but I’d attribute most of the vote disparity to the above.

“Playing the game” is a figure of speech.

I’m keenly aware. But, as you are likely aware, your utilization of said figure of speech implied a stratagem being was being employed and/or that it was a functional one. It did of course have the possibility of meaning “continue down the broken path” amongst others. My initial comment clearly implies this was my interpretation of it. Based on your reply - I had little reason to assume that your figure of speech, which carries a broad variety of meaning in this context, differed from said interpretation. In fact: you supported my interpretation with your follow-up comment which is exactly what led to my response.

Yes, that is my point.

Forgive me, I’m confused as to what your point was then. Your figures of speech seem to have muddled the water enough to make this conversation cyclical… so perhaps some clarification would help. Care to provide some insight on the two times you used it?

Republicans hated Trump during (and only during) his initial run for the presidency. He was a grifter saying whatever he could to get a vote and his platform seemed threatening to them initially. Once they realized how easy he was to control they had no issue with him. He’s a useful idiot who thinks he’s winning a game of checkers when everyone else is playing chess.

Speaking of games - as far as I can tell MAGA isn’t playing any game at all: they are simply a hate group with a figurehead.

…but I’ll bite - what game do you think they are playing?

Absolutely nothing… hence the It needs to change bit.

Realistically it’s the same question I could pose you saying just play the game… What exactly does picking the “lesser of two evils” net us? A race to the bottom. It’s not ideal nor does it work. The most recent election is a perfect example of this.

I wouldn’t exactly define this current situation as working, would you?

Goodness me. It’s so dangerous it eats away at untreated metal. How could they foist this dangerous mixture onto us. It’s worse than micro plastics. I heard estimates that claim it’s now found in every living American… and may even be now found in almost all of our food. Absolutely disgusting.

A two party system that uses first past the post?

Needs to change.