• favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Claims without any supporting evidence aren’t that interesting.

    Edit: OP changed his post after I called him out for not referencing any sources

    • Jack@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      How to blow up a pipeline has a chapter on the topic.

      You can also read the original book and check the examples.

      P.C. this is article about the fourth mentioned protest in the article, and literally the second paragraph is about clashes. There are 11 casualties during this series of protests.

      But you knew that with your high standards of verifying information right?

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        P.C. this is article about the four mentioned protest in the article, and literally the second paragraph is about clashes.

        Which states

        Clashes break out as police try to disperse the crowds and eight demonstrators are killed.

        Police killing protesters makes a violent movement?

        They’re not exactly an armed group of combatants coordinating attacks.

        Working with Maria Stephan, a researcher at the ICNC, Chenoweth performed an extensive review of the literature on civil resistance and social movements from 1900 to 2006 – a data set then corroborated with other experts in the field.

        Research.

        How to blow up a pipeline has a chapter on the topic.

        Research?

        But you knew that with your high standards of verifying information right?

        Do your standards measure up to that?