130
Venice Pickpockets File Lawsuits Against Citizen Patrols In the city of canals, where tourists are often targeted by pickpockets, a grassroots group of volunteers calling themselves the “Not Distracted Citizens” has been working to deter theft by filming suspects and warning passersby. Now, in a surprising twist, some of the alleged pickpockets have turned the tables—filing lawsuits against the very citizens who caught them in action. The complaints, lodged in recent weeks, accuse volunteers of stopping people without authorization and filming them without consent, with legal claims that include stalking. The move has sparked debate in Venice, raising questions about where civic duty ends and unlawful behavior begins. Authorities Step In Venice’s local police chief, Marco Agostini, emphasized that private citizens cannot take on the role of law enforcement. “The absence of clear national rules makes it difficult to respond effectively,” he noted. Monica Poli, the group’s most visible figure—nicknamed “Lady Pickpocket”—expressed frustration at the legal backlash. “We are on the side of legality, yet somehow we become the guilty ones,” she said. Political Proposals City and regional leaders have seized on the controversy to push for tougher measures against repeat offenders. Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has renewed calls for a special magistrate with the power to impose up to 12 days of immediate detention. Veneto Governor Luca Zaia has suggested electronic monitoring bracelets for repeat offenders, funded by municipalities. Justice Undersecretary Andrea Ostellari proposed sanctions targeting families who encourage minors to steal, including the removal of parental custody in severe cases. Rising Tensions Pickpocketing in Venice has grown increasingly aggressive, with reports of pepper spray being used and thefts occurring even inside churches. The frustration of residents has led to symbolic gestures, such as the installation of a mock street sign reading “Calle Pickpocket.” A Legal Grey Area The paradox of citizens facing charges while trying to deter crime has underscored a gap in Italy’s legal framework. Until clearer laws are enacted, Venice’s volunteer patrols risk paying the price for their vigilance—while professional pickpockets continue to exploit the city’s millions of annual visitors. Ph: Simona Sirio / Shutterstock.com
The article is a little vague on what it is they’re doing to the pickpockets that isn’t legal. Filming them? Do the laws in Milan not allow filming people who are in public? Are they assaulting them in some way when they see them pickpocketing or about to? Are they posting videos of it and that’s the legally gray part? It just keeps reiterating that the national laws aren’t clear about it so it’s a little confusing what exactly is going on.
Also:
New high score?
(Venice isn’t Milan! But they are both in Italy, in neighbouring regions.)
It seems like some far right group is trying to get views. And I wouldn’t be surprised if they just target coloured & queer folk.
Basically they walk around & secretly film random people they think they might pickpocket someone at some time & shout loudly whilst pointing at them. And then post videos online (TikTok). Even if no pickpocketing occurred or was tried.
And ofc everyone should be allowed to seek legal consequences for that.
Imagine Batman doing that (actually, with no superpowers that might be the best strat against enemies
with superpowers).As why this garbage article was written this way (or posted here) idk. It’s more ‘The Onion’ than ‘Not The Onion’.
Oops, that’s on me for glancing at the site name instead of double checking the article, lol.
Thanks for the additional context about the harassment and targeting minorities aspect of it, that wasn’t something I realized was going on here. In that case it makes total sense for the ‘pickpockets’ to sue them.
I don’t know if they do target minorities, it just seems like a very probable context to the legal proceedings (I don’t know much about the subject in general, I rarely follow any news).