Trolls & bots fail to understand or accept that Russia is anything but infinite and inevitable - but numbers are numbers. They’ve spent half of their entire Soviet inheritance to steal what they sit on today. The war doesn’t end when they get to zero vehicles. The half they’ve squandered is surely the BETTER half, and they still need an army for territorial defense and internal repression. Ukraine is not about the break, and this is probably the best position Russia is ever going to be in. This is the endgame of this messy, abusive Divorce, and Pootz has to come up with some whopper lies to say it was all worthwhile.

  • sepi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Russia doesn’t have any working nukes. If it did, it would have thrown one at Ukraine. And nobody would give a fuck about it - neither the US nor any other nuclear power would get into it over Ukraine getting nuked. Am ukrainian, before y’all talk any shiz.

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Russia has thousands of nukes. No doubt they aren’t in the best shape ever but they don’t need all of them to work. And there’s no way they’d nuke Ukraine. The rest of the world would ostracize them. You’re just wrong.

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        Russia has been ostracized.

        I suppose they could get embargoed harder by China and India, but if they nuked Ukraine they might get buked back.

        The US might decide to hold off but the UK or France could put one down.

        I doubt they would nuke a major city, but they might set one off in the country as a “Consequence”

      • sepi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Have you seen these nukes? Do you believe the russians at face value?

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          That’s a pretty big bet that no country would ever be prepared to make. That’s like gambling the guy who broke into your home doesn’t have any bullets in his gun

          • sepi@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            17 hours ago

            If I am punching the guy that broke into my house in the balls repeatedly and he doesn’t shoot me, he either has no bullets or no gun.

            • Skua@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Or he’s concerned about the five other guys with guns trained on him that all have a cautious understanding that nobody should shoot first. The Soviets didn’t nuke Afghanistan and America didn’t nuke Vietnam, after all

              • sepi@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Are those others with guns and understanding in the room with Ukraine rigjt now?

                  • sepi@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 hours ago

                    So you’re in your house, right? And I’m in my house. Good so far?

                    So a guy breaks into my house, and I’m punching the guy in the balls repeatedly. And you, in your house, are currently afraid of that guy.

                    I think this is a perfect analogy for the current situation everybody finds themselves in at the moment.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      This is a horrible take; russia underspent on their army (with current results) to upgrade and refurbish the nuclear forces.

      • drhodl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        55 seconds ago

        No. They underspent on their army because Midget Pootin and his cronies, needed new holiday palaces, Yuri.

      • sepi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The trick is that the money for the nukes was stolen. Nukes have value as a boogey-man and the russians expected everybody to be scared of the idea that they had nukes. You seem to believe them on this front.