I mostly use apps installed from F-Droid, so I’m not sure how I’ll use the phone, except that it’s sometimes required as a contact method.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Quite frankly im going to keep using GraphineOS, it doesn’t really matter for me how much Google restricts AOSP code or sideloading. As much as I care about open source I need something secure and reliable.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I like Graphene, but I’m at the point where I would put up with less security for more freedom – I just wouldn’t put anything actually sensitive on my phone.

      It’s kind of silly that my phone should be an everything-device.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        How much less security are you willing to accept? LineageOS is significantly worse in terms of security while PostmarketOS is even wose than LineageOS. Also its not just security but reliability.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Like desktop level. Password protected. Encryption would be nice. As for reliability, I’m willing to put up with slowdown, waiting up to a minute to open apps, and maybe 2 hard crashes a day, if it means I get a fully free phone, or at least as close to it as we get now.

            • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Without a doubt. That’s pretty minor, considering I don’t think I’ve ever adjusted call volume in my life.

              • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                You have just perfectly described why mobile Linux is never going to take off, the mentality of “I dont personally need x feature therefore it’s not important”. This isnt some sort of complicated thing like nfc payment or bypassing play protect this is literally changing the audio. So many incredibly basic tasks like that require typing multiple terminal commands on mobile Linux. Even if only advanced features like system management required using the terminal it would still be too much for 99% of people (even I wouldn’t use it).

                • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Sure, but someone will without a doubt add the functionality. They always do. Seems to be the case with anything linux.

                  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    Theres a difference, some people use desktop Linux as their main desktop OS but very few people use mobile Linux (and significantly fewer use it as their main mobile os).