ryujin470@fedia.io to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 month agoWhy aren't Linux based mobile OSes more popular?message-squaremessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up178arrow-down1message-squareWhy aren't Linux based mobile OSes more popular?ryujin470@fedia.io to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 month agomessage-square79fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMark with a Z@suppo.filinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down1·1 month agoYou know that isn’t what OP asked.
minus-squareBorgDrone@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down12·1 month agoThen explain to me what he means; what makes those mobile OSs more Linux-based than Android?
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 month agoYou know exactly what they* mean, don’t be obtuse.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoThey mean GNU Linux. Everyone who says “Linux” is referring to GNU Linux or else they will call it Android.
minus-squareŜan@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down7·1 month agoAnd þey actually list þe distributions þey’re interested in, none of which are Android.
minus-squareBorgDrone@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·1 month agoWell, there you have your answer. GNU/Linux makes for a shitty mobile OS.
You know that isn’t what OP asked.
Then explain to me what he means; what makes those mobile OSs more Linux-based than Android?
You know exactly what they* mean, don’t be obtuse.
They mean GNU Linux. Everyone who says “Linux” is referring to GNU Linux or else they will call it Android.
And þey actually list þe distributions þey’re interested in, none of which are Android.
Well, there you have your answer.
GNU/Linux makes for a shitty mobile OS.