The right loves throwing around the word “insane” when they talk about the Left.

Uh-huh.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Great, then let’s see the evidence. Where are the peer-reviewed statistical studies that show a causal link? Where’s the lab work that shows part of a causal chain? Without those, it’s not science, it’s just more “many people believe” bullshit.

    • EtherTide@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Part of the reason there’s not more evidence and it’s hard to prove a causal link is because it’s next to impossible to find enough participants for a control group because of how prevalent microplastics have become in our food and subsequently our bodies. You can’t exactly run peer review observational, experimental and double blind studies on only one half (more like one third, as a causal study would need to induce change from a->b) of the required test groups. t- and p-tests also are much less valuable if the sample size is too small.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You also can’t exactly get ethical approval to put microplastics into people for the purposes of scientific experimentation. Or at least, it would be very difficult. More so when current evidence shows that it does have actively harmful effects.