You must log in or register to comment.
Sadly 12ft.io has been taken offline
Yeah this is really old and out of date
There is always https://archive.org/ or https://archive.ph/ for example
I definitely wouldn’t use reader mode even after the paywall comes up. Don’t ever do that.
Disabling Javascript with ublock origin works most of time for me.
Hasn’t worked on most sites in a long time. The obscuring is now done on the server side so the text never gets to the browser. Otherwise it used to be easy to just use the developer console or uBlock to just remove the components that concealed the text or prevent the browser refreshing to prevent the concealing.
I can’t recall which right now, but there are ones that manage to scrape the entire content by spoofing the Google crawler.
Since websites want to maximise their SEO, they must provide the raw content to be indexed betterOften the content is available without masking for a very short time so scrapers can access them or similar tricks to allow them access immediately after posting. But that requires that you hit the server immediately after the story is posted and there is no masking at all usually in those cases. That’s how things like archive.is get a copy for example. But none of that is client/browser side anymore, at least on the major sites. Otherwise it’s easy to defeat if the content is already provided to the browser and just masked with JavaScript or something that runs locally and can be blocked.
And DO NOT DEFINITELY search Internet Archive for the first version of the article!
I have a JavaScript bookmark that you click from any site that’ll automatically pull up the latest archived version. Super handy.
javascript:window.location.href = "https://web.archive.org/web/" + window.location.href;They have their own browser extension that does that, plus gives you an “archive now” button, and some other stuff I don’t use.
DuckDuckGo bangs are great for this. Just add
!wayback(with the space) after the URL of the article you are reading, and it will search the Wayback Machine for that article.Example: If the URL for the article is
website.com/propaganda.html, change it towebsite.com/propaganda.html !waybackand press enter.This also works on Kagi for anybody else using it
hah, TIL, thanks!
Works with Kagi and Brave too!
Both of you guys are godsends. Thankyou. I never knew this
none of these worked for me on NYT, reader mode also did not work. seems sites have gotten around these tricks
Thease tricks depend on sending the full article, then obscuring it with CSS or JavaScript. Lots of places now just won’t send the full text until you pay. So these tricks won’t work.
Was scary to install that extension but now I can confirm it works as intended
Crazy how to me why this is not more widely known. Best solution.
Every time it’s recommended people shit themselves over the .ru domain. I don’t think people realise just how much pirated content comes out of Russia, it’s very normal and nothing to be afraid of.
The best solution, imho. Been around for a long time and so notorious it got removed for DMCA violations on github and gitlab so it had to move to a service outside US copyright cabal jurisdictions.
Tried and true. :)
Is there any way to install this on Android?Should have read the page first. There are very simple instructions for installing on Android.
Just because it bothered me
append beforeprepend.How preprendious of you.
Im pro-
prependPro pend and pro pend accessories
aproprepending we will go
À-prorpendai
Forepend.
Foreskin?
Yes, appended to the taint.
I don’t do this. If I see a paywall, I don’t visit the site again.
The Verge recently went with paywalls… I just deleted the bookmark. It was never a very good site anyway. They blasted an Android phone for doing something new, and then praised Apple for doing the exact same thing. I forget what. We were calling them iVerge for a while after that. (It was not recently.) Even as an Apple guy, I could not respect that. But the content has been entertaining, so I kept going back. I definitely will not pay them for their content though.
Oh you mean the guys that hazed an idiot by making him do a pc build tutorial?
How is it I never thought to use the print pdf or copy paste trick? Would have saved me a bunch of struggling prior to finding the paywall removers.
It’s not piracy in any way shape or form. If they sent the document to your computer then you have the document, reading that document and saving it elsewhere are not crimes and never can be, because the only way the Internet works is by transmitting the document to you where your computer must store it in some way.
This is how I feel about ads. If I request an article or video from a website and they send it to me alongside an ad, shouldn’t I just be able to say “no thank you” to the ad and not accept it\block it. The content I asked for was willingly sent to me so it seems hard to claim that it was stolen or pirated.
Yes that’s exactly why adblockers will always be legal. You cannot be forced to run spyware on your own computer systems (unless the law changes which it might).
Except that is not how it works and courts have in the past ruled for the website and against people who took “secret” information out of web responses that were “not supposed to be displayed” in the browser.
Name the cases.
No you’re most likely talking about computer access, not piracy. And please do link the ones you’re talking about.
Weird, I’ve read the opposite. I’ve heard courts have ruled that data returned by servers is public, even if they’re obscured in the front end
Gonna go out on a limb and say that 9 times out of 10 if this works, turning off JS will also work.
To which I’d then suggest just getting a browser extension like uMatrix to set up whitelisting for JS since it’s a big ol’ security hole anyways. Kill two birds with one stone.
My rule of thumb: Do not ever link to, or follow links to, or read the New York Times.
Exactly, those guys are scum. Read the Washington Post, much cooler dudes, totally not parroting billionaire talking points.
I’m sure there’s still a good American newspaper out there somewhere, but I don’t know what it is. All the familiar big ones seem to have fallen.
This is my point. People don’t want to pay for any journalism, so all of it billionaire talking points and clickbait.
There aren’t any good ‘big’ ones, but local ones are often worth paying for and supporting since they actually do good journalism.
Also, do NOT use the Firefox’s Reader View.
I literally won’t read articles if they won’t let me use reader view. It’s always trash news sites anyway so I’m not missing anything
LibreWolf also has the Reader View, also do not use that.
Although LibreWolf doesn’t state that in their TOS, unlike Firefox.
Firefox (or other browsers idk) with reading mode works 90% of the time.
I’ve found more and more that sites are blocking it… But it still works a lot of the time. Maybe like 50/50 for me.
If it doesn’t work, try going into reading mode, then reloading the page. Often times, that catches many of the problematic sites that try to block Reading Mode
Yeah that works sometimes
