

Good to know!


Good to know!


Oh sweet.


I thought it was only voice though. Not screen share or chat.


There are studies. Hence the multiple cheating scandals, because we know how small of a change can massively affect your flight. Here’s one:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12611860/
Changing the suit circumference by +2 cm increased the lift area (𝐶𝑙𝐴) by ∼5% and the drag area (𝐶𝑑𝐴) by ∼4%. This was simulated to change the jump length by 5.8 m, which corresponds to an increase of 2.8 m/cm in suit tolerance, for a reference jump of 130 m
2.8 meters for every increase in a single centimeter of circumference.


Every additional centimeter of circumference on your suit gives you almost ten extra feet of distance. It’s insane.


Usenet has existed just fine for decades doing the same thing. They’ll never prosecute for downloaders, only uploaders. And encryption is just getting more and more powerful so that’s unlikely to change.


Oh man I miss Jenna Marbles. I haven’t watched her in a decade easy.
In any case, she is mostly wrong here. Breast size is dependent on a lot of factors, and for those at the Olympics their breasts are much more likely to be much smaller than average. This is a result of training, high testosterone, and genetic body type. Yes bras do affect things, but the top athletes are just more likely to have smaller breasts because that’s how science works. That doesn’t mean that top athletes can’t have larger breasts, it just means it’s less likely.


I think they would fly much shorter. Smaller body, most women in sports have smaller breasts, no package = much less surface area.


So you’re saying there’s a chance.
Brb. Gonna eat oats for two days then switch to steak, half and half, and candy.


I think Queen is in this category, cause it’s rock opera.


I thought this was well known. That’s why I don’t understand people using whatsapp at all. On android and ios products from the same company can access data between different apps, breaking through the sandbox. So if you have WA and FB installed, FB can see the data in WA and then send it in plain text back to meta’s servers (or encrypting with a key they have access to).
This does not mean that WA isn’t e2e encrypted. That’s why this spokesman can say:
“Any claim that people’s WhatsApp messages are not encrypted is categorically false and absurd,” spokesman Andy Stone said in an email. “WhatsApp has been end-to-end encrypted using the Signal protocol for a decade. This lawsuit is a frivolous work of fiction.”
And be completely truthful, and yet the lawsuit also be completely truthful. If you can visually see it on your screen then Meta can have access to it if they wanted. You have to actually trust the company behind the software as well and it needs to be open source and auditable and that still isn’t necessarily enough. WA already doesn’t meet two of these requirements so why in the world would you trust it at all?
Here’s an article talking about this on iOS. https://iosbrain.com/blog/2022/05/24/beyond-the-sandbox-using-app-groups-to-communicate-between-ios-or-macos-apps/


Who?





Probably depends on the restaurant if the menu is up to date, but this was the first one I clicked on and it has the menu listed multiple times in multiple places.
The delivery filter is in the scrollbar below the map


Google maps does the same thing…


It’s not, but they get more business on the apps, even if the apps take a massive cut.


I’ve seen this article with at least 5 different verbs now. “Stunned”, “gobsmacked”, yadda yadda yadda


Master bedroom/bathroom with a cat or dog water bowl? A WaterPik? A fish tank? A cleaning system for a fish tank (uses suction from faucet to filter the gravel). A cup? Watering small plants? A cactus you don’t want to overwater. Rinsing out a soap bottle. Rinsing out your toothbrush quietly so you don’t wake your wife. Humidifier.
CachyOS, Nobara, Bazzite, there’s a lot of good options.