Yeah it was relatively recent. I think earlier this year. Can’t remember exactly, it’s been a longgggg year. I never managed to get it integrated with HA and the creator passed away and nobody knew if it was going to get picked up by anyone else so I just fully stopped trying.
Would love to know what you find. I started to use Willow months before the creator passed away and it seemed like the only option available (not the best option, literally the only option due to all the reasons you listed). If you find something I’d love to know.
Is it 3d printed? The sheen looks very 3d printed like.
Wait. Y’all aren’t taking your phone into the shower with you?
That is a common misconception, very often spread all over the place on Reddit. There is no such requirement.
And corporate case law describes directors as fiduciaries who owe duties not only to shareholders but also to the corporate entity itself, and instructs directors to use their powers in “the best interests of the company.”
Serving shareholders’ “best interests” is not the same thing as either maximizing profits, or maximizing shareholder value. “Shareholder value,” for one thing, is a vague objective: No single “shareholder value” can exist, because different shareholders have different values. Some are long-term investors planning to hold stock for years or decades; others are short-term speculators.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/13-354.html
https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/shareholder-value-purpose-corporation
Nobody said anything about selling data. You said data collection. And the fediverse is literally entirely public, so beehaw doesn’t have to do anything for your activity here to be tracked across numerous locations.
This one is so annoying.
The website you use right now literally wouldn’t function without “data collection”.
That isn’t the app installation screen. It’s the store page. Where else would you show it? Telepathically to the user as soon as they think of the app?
Do tell. In what way is this “obvious”?
Holy cow that’s an expensive pillow. I thought mine was expensive lol
Oh interesting. I’m not sure about the sliding down, I’ve not had that happen. The one I linked holds it shape very well, the recommendations actually say you should fluff it every night but I have only fluffed it like 4 or five times since getting it years ago.
You’re welcome for the recommendation!
An adjustable, removable fill, cutout, side sleep pillow. https://a.co/d/aXcI4Wx
I’ve even bought one for my step mom. The brand is amazing, and removable fill is the way to go.
The top comment I replied to stated that this was a black and white issue. Either you are a landlord and that’s unethical or you’re not and it’s ethical. You seem to have taken this conversation in a completely different direction. It is solely about whether you can be a landlord ethically.
I also did not assume the majority want to do anything.
Pretty sure my desktop goes into hibernation, I’ve only got 64gb of ram, but it doesn’t take longer than like 10 seconds to resume from that. I think.
I know people (including myself who actually owns a house) who would love to (or already do) travel the world. Buying and selling houses in every location you travel would be a hindrance not a help.
There is no black and white, this is an ethics discussion, there are shades of gray for everything. Just because you want to stay in one location and never move doesn’t mean others want what you want.
Edit: adjusted sentence to make it easier to understand
you say this as if most people would be like that. whereas most people don’t want to travel all the time
I do not, I say it because it has to be involved in any discussion of ethics. It isn’t a binary problem. There are shades of gray to everything, which people hate talking about.
I know many people that like renting because they want to move every few months or years. Their job affords it (which any reasonable nation also allows), they work remote, or they’re mobile, etc.
Acting like everything is black and white when it literally never is is making it impossible to have actually discussions that enact change.
Wouldn’t you like to travel the world and see the sights? Would you want to have to buy a house and sell your old one every single time you changed countries? I think not.
That’s not my assumption. I know people that only want to rent, they don’t want to own. In that worldview someone owns it.
In regards to paying for shelter, unless you get rid of money, things have to be maintained, that costs money, and someone has to be paid to fix it, even if it’s the government paying a contractor.
The government doesn’t like owning things that require enormous amounts of maintenance. It’s a liability, because they can’t then focus efforts on actually serving their citizens. So if the government is already going to pay someone to maintain buildings, it’s better to not own the buildings and instead regulate in a manner than serves everyone.
That means there will still be landlords. There are still people that want to rent, the government doesn’t like owning buildings, so there will still be people owning and renting their places out.
Many people wouldn’t recognize Bill Gates or Marilyn Monroe either. That has nothing to do with if they’re famous or not. You’re being disingenuous and you know it.