• Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reading through the comments in this thread, I’d just like to mention how amusing it is to see so many people in the fediverse arguing in favor of walled gardens and vendor lock-in. Like, do you even know where you are?

  • raresbears@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it just me that has literally never heard anyone bring up the colour of bubbles irl? Like I’ve seen people talk about it on the internet from time to time but never in the real world.

  • jboyens@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem that I have with the way Apple does this has nothing whatsoever to do with me. It’s their device, it is not possible for me to care any less about it.

    No, the problem I have is that it becomes a severe bullying / exclusion tactic among kids. Now, kids will always find something to bully other kids about, but this one seems to hurt a lot because of the source of the ire and the inability to do anything about it (short of purchasing an Apple device).

    My eldest was excluded from group chats with friends because they “ruined” the quality of pictures and videos by being in the group chat. These are friends mind you, not the sort of bullies the rest of us might’ve had. It’s devastating to kids when their friends exclude them like this. What do you do? You can’t complain about the technology not mattering, you can’t reason with it, you can’t say: “it gets better”.

    Kids these days have a very different relationship to technology. That relationship can seem weird or “wrong” to folks who remember a time before these ubiquitous devices. Crap patterns like this creating artificial walled gardens are not “novel” or “creative” ways to increase sales.

    • burgersc12@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to make light of your kids situation, but sending pics/videos over mms is horrible they aren’t being metaphorical when they say it ruins the chats. Imagine compressing a video to < 1MB and you would get something unseeable. Now i would recommned they all switch to snapchat, its very popular and wont mess with the group chat no matter the device used :)

    • Benghandhi@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hell, adults and “friends” of mine really seem to care that I have an android. They constantly bring it up as if they think bullying another adult into buying their specific product will somehow work or maybe they think that it bothers me or something. I could not care less. Start a new chat without me and the other android users? Cool, go ahead. Spoiler: they won’t.

      • frostycakes@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Or they have and haven’t told you, as I’ve experienced multiple times now (as an adult in my thirties, no less). It’s why I fell out of my bar trivia group, they slowly forgot to send us Android users (aka my partner and I) texts separately, so we just drifted out of that circle.

        It’s comical how petty so many adults get about the bubbles too, and absolutely refuse to consider using anything else. Luckily my partner was on the Pixel train like me before we met, so it’s not an issue there, but suggest Signal, Telegram, or hell, even Facebook Messenger (which they all have as well), and you just get befuddlement in response. Even my mother, who is in her fifties and is a department director at her job, gets perpetual shit from her coworkers re: the staff group chats that just can’t go into Slack for whatever reason, as she’s the lone Android user in that whole bunch. None of these people even grew up with cellphones of any type, and yet they’re just as petty about messaging as any socially-obsessed teen.

        Oh well, no skin off my back, and if anything this petty behavior from a subset of iOS users is basically an anti-advertisement to me. The last time I had an iPhone, I deliberately disabled iMessage from the get go to head off this mess (and at the time, turning it off when switching away from iOS was a nightmare too).

    • WarMarshalEmu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately most of the US user base would rather cling to any sort of elitism than actually search for a solution to an invented problem.

      • pandarisu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This does seem to be a US centric problem, I don’t know anyone who still uses SMS, everyone seems to use Facebook Messenger/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal here

  • FuckFashMods@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unfortunately this is what makes iPhones “iPhones”

    They bring out features that generally make the phone part of the smartphone better to use.

    RCS is still a mess on androids. And calling on iPhones is about to feel very modern while android phones will still be calling people the same way people did 20 years ago.

      • FuckFashMods@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have 2 friends with different samsungs and both my parents with newer samsungs. Neither one of them have RCS. Idk if you have to enable it or anything.

    • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there even a difference between how iPhone and android calling ‘feels’? They’re both the exact same as 20 years ago lmao its a phone call, it’s been replaced by like a thousand apps by now

  • Reeek@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Owh dammit what now. I haven’t read it yet but I’m already tired of it

  • !ozoned@lemmy.world@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hang on … I set a picture on MY phone and then anyone I call sees MY picture? Oh yeah, can’t see how this’ll go wrong. How long before dick picks are sent, or advertisements, or someone finds a way to use it to hack someones phone.

    I can see this could be useful, especially folks with eye sight issues (but how would this affect blind folks?), but it’s just another way to tell someone who is calling. I don’t answer my phone unless they’re in my contact book already.

    This seems eh to me, but I’m not an Apple person anyway.

    • RealJoL@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      especially folks with eye sight issues

      Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t some phones already call out the name of the caller for blind people? Heard it on a train once, maybe a feature I can’t seem to find on my phone.

    • handvat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not much different than a profile picture on most social media networks, is it? You could have done all of this with your Lemmy profile picture as well.

      • !ozoned@lemmy.world@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Phones are a bit more ubiquitous for older folks though. Imagine a vulnerability that allows me to post my “pic” as pulling from your phone and it comes up with a picture of your cousin or something. Or if I’m targeting you, you’re an old person that doesn’t understand technology and you see your granddaughter show up in the picture and don’t look at the number or anything. There seems to be a lot of ways this can be abused. I hope I’m wrong and we’ll never see a story about people abusing it, but people pretty much always abuse these things.

  • quarterlotus@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t see this actually being a big deal, like at all, lmao. This assumes everyone cares or even knows the implications of a contact poster, and you can even make them for contacts that haven’t made one themselves. If you automatically think “ew Android!” when someone didn’t make a contact poster (when they can literally be on iOS, but not make one), you have issues.

    • butter@lemmy.jamestrey.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As I understand, most iphone users do have issues. I remember hearing that people with Androids in their selfies are measurably less likely to match on Tinder

    • xray@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with Signal is there is no way to backup your messages on iOS. I’m a very pro-privacy and used Signal for a while but stopped. Being able to have backups of my conversations with loved ones is more important than having the utmost privacy to me.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The inability to backup your own data is a feature now? That’s some Stockholm Syndrome bullshit.

          • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, there is no backups because you shouldn’t have secure information laying around unsecured as a backup. Stockholm syndrome is WhatsApp or Apple Message where its not secured at all.

            • Blissingg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Who said the backup needs to be insecure?

              You can literally encrypt the backup itself and use a pass phrase for unlocks. WhatsApp already does just that. Also WhatsApp uses Signals encryption and last time it was audited it passed with flying colours.

              It’s possible they can push an update that would do client side scanning of messages while typed or that have been sent but this would be trivial to find out about and has never been reported on.

  • mici01@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    TBH I don’t really want want to anything to do with people that see me as less because I don’t have a fancy calling animation anyway.

  • maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The EU is already legislating to solve this. They are forcing open APIs on iMessage with the DMA.

  • Djokkum@rammy.site
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    RCS could have been great if e2e were baked in from the start. Apple would not have had such a strong argument to stay with its own standard and we might not have found ourselves with this divide.

    • NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple doesn’t need an argument to stay with their own standards lol. Their reasoning is and has always been to make it harder and/or less appealing to leave their ecosystem in any way. Any arguments they make are fabricated after the fact