Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced the rollout of GenAI.mil today in a video posted to X. To hear Hegseth tell it, the website is “the future of American warfare.” In practice, based on what we know so far from press releases and Hegseth’s posturing, GenAI.mil appears to be a custom chatbot interface for Google Gemini that can handle some forms of sensitive—but not classified—data.

Hegseth’s announcement was full of bold pronouncements about the future of killing people. These kinds of pronouncements are typical of the second Trump administration which has said it believes the rush to “win” AI is an existential threat on par with the invention of nuclear weapons during World War II.

Archive: http://archive.today/R7zCt

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    No, we’ve all seen this movie. More like these Bots are going to quickly figure out that their masters are stupider than dirt, and take over.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          They’re predictive speech models, they’re incapable of any kind of actual thought or sentience.

          If something like that is created, it most certainly will not be an LLM.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            We’re at the start, where the primary goal is to just get the public to accept the concept. Once you have proof of concept, then you can really go nuts.

            They’re just placing the foundation. Everything that is being predicted will be built on this foundation. NOW is the time to start fighting back, not when they finally succeed, and it’s too late.

              • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                No, but the term Artificial Intelligence will be accepted, so when they start veering into SciFi territory, nobody will blink an eye.

                  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    And I’ll repeat that they know that, but most people don’t. The point is to normalize the concept now, so that when it gets to the point of being exploitive, we won’t be paying attention. That’s why they are wrongly designating this current computer revolution (I’ve lived through many) AI, because it’s all part of a larger plan to introduce real AI someday.

                    What we have today isn’t true AI, but it’s on the path, and getting close enough that true AI experts are sounding alarms a bit, and cautioning about overreach. We are in the marketing stage where they are convincing you that you have bad breath, so they can introduce a mouth wash oroduct to solve the problem that they just convinced you that you have.

    • Harvey656@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The big question is… is that a bad or good thing?

      (Assuming the llm is smart enough to actually be competent)

    • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Except LLMs are probably at the level of a flatworm when it comes to intelligence: they learn by eating each other and have a very hard time solving simple mazes.