The way I read the article, the plaintiff is both, but it doesn’t explicitly say that. It just makes sense that plaintiff is both a player, using the scarcity to their advantage, and also an investor in the company – i.e. losing $$$ in both cases. I’ll be curious to see if this suit goes anywhere.
It’s not the card speculators suing, it’s the corpo investors.
The way I read the article, the plaintiff is both, but it doesn’t explicitly say that. It just makes sense that plaintiff is both a player, using the scarcity to their advantage, and also an investor in the company – i.e. losing $$$ in both cases. I’ll be curious to see if this suit goes anywhere.