• frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is why you don’t expose services to the Internet, especially with weak or no authentication.

        • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There are far better, more secure ways to do this. You could use a reverse proxy. You could use tailscale. You could use wireguard.

          The last thing you should do is open Frigate’s port to the net.

            • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              I know, but it seemed like there was confusion about my intended point, which is that you should never expose it to the open internet. It wasn’t a question I really intended to be answered since I know that was their intention. My confusion is why do that when there are secure alternatives, some of which are easier than opening a port.

        • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          24 hours ago

          That’s my use case. But my frigate-box is strictly behind firewall and I access it over wireguard when I’m away.

          • lankydryness@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I second this. I have notifications set up via homeassistant, and if I want to view a feed I just VPN in