• xyro@morbier.foo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    “This vulnerability is only exploitable by an administrator or users who have exposed their Frigate install to the open internet with no authentication which allows anyone full administrative control.” High, but not critical

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is why you don’t expose services to the Internet, especially with weak or no authentication.

        • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          There are far better, more secure ways to do this. You could use a reverse proxy. You could use tailscale. You could use wireguard.

          The last thing you should do is open Frigate’s port to the net.

            • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              I know, but it seemed like there was confusion about my intended point, which is that you should never expose it to the open internet. It wasn’t a question I really intended to be answered since I know that was their intention. My confusion is why do that when there are secure alternatives, some of which are easier than opening a port.

        • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          22 hours ago

          That’s my use case. But my frigate-box is strictly behind firewall and I access it over wireguard when I’m away.

          • lankydryness@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I second this. I have notifications set up via homeassistant, and if I want to view a feed I just VPN in