Clickbait:

I understand not wanting to “editorialize” the author’s title, and it’s even forbidden in some communities. That’s fine, just include something in the text, or possibly append it to the end of the title in brackets. ie:

Scientists have unveiled the secret to long life using this one weird trick! [diet and exercise]

Probably 90% of articles I come across can be summarized in 1-2 sentences. I often find myself doing just that, in other people’s posts, but putting it in the comments makes it far less visible.

Sources:

Please do not link your post to a source of a source. Sometimes I have to click 3 and 4 articles deep to find the original source. Many times they don’t include the original source, or any other source to speak of, they just link back to their own publication a dozen fucking times. If you come across an article that links to another source, which also isn’t the original source, and without adding meaningful context, just link to the original source, please.

Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.

    • artyom@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I don’t discredit them but I often avoid them, both because they give me no reason to watch/read them, and also just out of spite.

      • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        If something is obvious click bait I do the same, but many legit authors use clickbait because it’s needed in this attention economy.

        (see the video link I posted above)

        • artyom@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I saw the video you posted when it was published several years ago. I don’t care why they do it.

            • artyom@piefed.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Your own posts have clickbaity titles.

              No they don’t.

              It’s sadly basically unavoidable

              It’s absolutely not. Even if it were, including context when sharing third party links is also not unavoidable.

              Why don’t more distros do this… (click here and find out)

              You can’t click it and find out, because I don’t know. It was a genuine question. There’s a picture explaining exactly what I’m talking about. I don’t make money using this account, I have no motivation to use clickbait.

              • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I agree adding context is great, ideally even add a summary so a person doesn’t have to click.

                “You can click it and find out.” How is that not clickbait?

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Veritasium’s newest video was so clickbaity. I watched for 15 minutes and he didn’t get to the part where he explains the title. I quit watching when he interviewed a professor at a university in Israel. Those universities design weapons for mass murder of civilians.