• elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Why didn’t they pour money on Jitsi?

    European, mature, FOSS…

    I fear grift is there somewhere.

    Also, French engineering has a habit of turning sound concepts into messy overengineerd but underbuilt results.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The development is quite transparent. The team is looking at reduced development and more integration, so instead of “pouring money on a project”, they tried various solutions, and picked the “best one”.

      One criteria was an integration with their internal communication system: Tchap, essentially a Matrix server. The Matrix video call group didn’t cut it because it requires ElementX, and apparently there are unresolved issue there (no idea if it’s the app itself or due to customization of their Matrix server). They ended up with Visio, that is not a “new” solution: it’s based on LiveKit.

      https://github.com/tchapgouv/tchap-product/issues/259

    • gdaofb27584@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Also, French engineering has a habit of turning sound concepts into messy overengineerd but underbuilt results

      Any example ?

    • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      My guess would be that its because La Suite tries to replace all of Microsoft Office and having all the moving parts under your organisations control makes it easier to create a fully integrated office suite that offers the same UX throughout. Also Jitsi is owned by 8x8, a US company, which might have factored into the decision to create something new.