Zoom in x200

Left: 720p x264 --> 0.25 GB

Right: 1080p x265 --> 1.11 GB

I tested watching both on my phone:

  • Without zoom, I didn’t notice much difference in visuals.
  • The audio is stronger at the same level on the x265 version.
  • I need +15 volume level (Android) to make the x264 sound equal.

What do you think, guys? Is it worth 4 times the file size?

  • deranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Why not compare 720p 265 to 1080p 265? I don’t get anything in 264 these days, 265 support is ubiquitous and the performance is so much better.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s not just about codec and resolution, either. Every algorithm has a bunch of parameters that you can adjust, so you could get a 4k60hz video with a reasonable file size and still have it look like crap. And that’s not even mentioning the audio quality.