Anarchy is a political structure where there’s basically no one in charge, right? But wouldn’t that just create a power vacuum that would filled by organized crime, corporations, etc.? Then, after that power vacuum is filled, we’re right back at square one, and someone is in charge.

Are there any political theorists that have come up with a solution to this problem?

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I really like low scale anarchy (town level) but high scale would only work with strong scifi-level decentralization tools where public goods can be negotiated and developed without massive centralized bodies.

    Alternatively society has to enter a post resource scarcity era - as in star trek replicator level of advancement.

    Another way it could work if there was a massive population reduction as very few people in the world left but at that point political systems are the least interesting thing to think about.

    Unfortunately due to game theory and real life power curves true global anarchism with current technology is simply impossible.