That was already performed in China.
Kids were born outside of hospitals and either were ghost people without proper paperworl or registered as children of other family members like the sister.
I’m still curious what OP was thinking when posing this question to the community.
Its not a forbidden question.
Nothing about my post said I support it.
Should I explain to you why people ask questions? Are we simply not supposed to ask controversial questions on Lemmy?
If you were actually curious as to why I asked, I was just wondering, nothing more deep. I’m sorry.
It’s just too many people get ‘curious’ as to why you’re asking the question in the first place when you ask a slightly controversial question. I got 2 of these for this post alone.
The question looks at finding an answer for controlling population increase. Nothing was ‘specifically’ said about women. If it affects women more, I didn’t think of that
Besides, there are other means for controlling population such as crushing men’s testicles which is also pretty bad but doesn’t control women.
I notice that you have replied to my other comment. You must know I meant that as an upper limit. Is there a reason you need to pretend you didn’t read it?
I meant as an upper limit.
Forcing women to terminate pregnancies is as cruel as forcing them to be inseminated.
What’s your point with this question?
That was already performed in China.
Kids were born outside of hospitals and either were ghost people without proper paperworl or registered as children of other family members like the sister.
Omg, that’s awful
Yeah and it’s cruel. I’m still curious what OP was thinking when posing this question to the community.
There’s no answer here that isn’t a disgusting look at how women and fertility and birth is treated.
Its not a forbidden question. Nothing about my post said I support it. Should I explain to you why people ask questions? Are we simply not supposed to ask controversial questions on Lemmy?
I said I was curious, not that it’s forbidden.
If you were actually curious as to why I asked, I was just wondering, nothing more deep. I’m sorry.
It’s just too many people get ‘curious’ as to why you’re asking the question in the first place when you ask a slightly controversial question. I got 2 of these for this post alone.
This question is looking specifically at controlling women so yes people are going to react negatively.
The question looks at finding an answer for controlling population increase. Nothing was ‘specifically’ said about women. If it affects women more, I didn’t think of that
Besides, there are other means for controlling population such as crushing men’s testicles which is also pretty bad but doesn’t control women.
I wanted to know what people think and what could be the pros and cons etc. That’s why people ask questions, don’t they?
There’s no pros to controlling women’s autonomy and bodies.
I never said that. Why’re you soo intent on putting words into my mouth?
Population could also be controlled by neutering men.
Not when it is a two child policy - women still birth those children.
Fundamentally this is a question centered around controlling women’s bodies because it’s women that bear and birth children.
And men still produce sperm. If we neuter them after 2 children we can still do it. Not that I like that. Just saying there is something else
Still forcing women to birth two children each.
I notice that you have replied to my other comment. You must know I meant that as an upper limit. Is there a reason you need to pretend you didn’t read it?
Read my other comment. I think I should have specified that in the post.