With exceptions in cases like when a couple loses a child

Edit: in a scenario where everything is good. No wars, no famine.

  • Karl@literature.cafeOP
    11·
    14 hours ago

    I’m still curious what OP was thinking when posing this question to the community.

    Its not a forbidden question. Nothing about my post said I support it. Should I explain to you why people ask questions? Are we simply not supposed to ask controversial questions on Lemmy?

      • Karl@literature.cafeOP
        1·
        13 hours ago

        If you were actually curious as to why I asked, I was just wondering, nothing more deep. I’m sorry.

        It’s just too many people get ‘curious’ as to why you’re asking the question in the first place when you ask a slightly controversial question. I got 2 of these for this post alone.

        • Velma@lemmy.today
          1·
          13 hours ago

          This question is looking specifically at controlling women so yes people are going to react negatively.

          • Karl@literature.cafeOP
            1·
            13 hours ago

            The question looks at finding an answer for controlling population increase. Nothing was ‘specifically’ said about women. If it affects women more, I didn’t think of that

            Besides, there are other means for controlling population such as crushing men’s testicles which is also pretty bad but doesn’t control women.

            • Velma@lemmy.today
              1·
              13 hours ago

              Women are the ones being either forced to birth two children or forced to abort to stay at two children.

              That you didn’t even think about how a policy around number of children allowed affects women is astounding.